People ask me whether I bring something different to the work when the audience is Black. I understand the question despite the audacity of it. I’m a Black editor who has spent the last several months focused almost entirely on Black writers, and I don’t pretend my cultural fluency disappears when a new project lands on my desk. But the honest answer isn’t “I try harder for my people.” That’s not provable, and it isn’t true. The truth is narrower, and more useful: the same attention and meticulousness gets applied every time. Only the terrain shifts, project to project, and that shift is what decides what needs catching.

Here’s what that looked like in practice.

What grammar can’t catch

In the Black health magazine, a piece on spirituality and cancer outcomes included this line:

“Researchers have also questioned whether this kind of personal faith can play a role in the cancer journey.”

Nothing wrong with it on its face. Subject, verb, clean syntax, any copyeditor would sail through it. I flagged it anyway. “Questioned whether” imports a note of institutional doubt into a sentence about a practice its own readers already trust and use. I suggested “explored whether” instead, and explained why: skepticism reads differently to an audience with documented, well-earned reasons to distrust how the medical establishment frames their health practices. Grammatically, the sentence worked either way. Editorially, only one version was correct.

A few weeks earlier, in the lifestyle magazine, a feature on athletes and performers navigating the end of the spotlight used theatrical language as its spine, calling the early days of a new career a “second act.” One line slipped and called it a “tour” instead. Also grammatically clean. And also wrong, for a completely different reason: it broke a structure the writer had built intentionally, sentence by sentence, across four pages. I flagged that one too.

Neither catch would show up on a style-guide scan. One required knowing something about the history sitting underneath a sentence about faith and medicine. The other required holding an entire piece’s architecture in my head while reading a single line inside it. Different knowledge, same instinct: read past what the sentence says to what it’s built to do.

Precision that has nothing to do with race

Some of the sharpest catches in both projects had nothing to do with identity at all, which is worth speaking about, because it’s easy to assume a Black editor’s value only shows up in Black-coded content.

In the health piece, a line about cancer cell mutation read

“uncontrollable growth of abnormal cells.”

I changed it to “uncontrolled.” It wasn’t a stylistic preference. Medically, the two words aren’t interchangeable. “Uncontrollable” says this can never be controlled. “Uncontrolled” describes where things stand right now, which is what treatment exists to change. For a reader learning about their own diagnosis, that’s the difference between despair and information.

In the lifestyle magazine’s speculative-design feature, a line read:

“The tone is wry and even optimistic.”

I changed the “and” to a comma. “The tone is wry, even optimistic.” That was the entire edit. But the comma creates a beat the sentence needed, a small pause before the surprise of “optimistic” lands. The “and” was flattening a sentence that wanted to move.

Neither edit needed me to be Black. Both needed me to be paying full attention. I’d like that to be unremarkable, and in a fair industry it would be. It isn’t yet, so I’m naming it.

The one place I won’t force a parallel

Here’s where I could reach for a tidy symmetry, and I’m not going to, because it would be dishonest.

In the health magazine, an early passage about spirituality described how:

“Slaves turned to it to maintain hope during Slavery.”

I changed it to “Enslaved people turned to spirituality to maintain hope during slavery,” and I made that correction without querying or explaining my reasoning. “Slaves” reduces people to the condition forced on them. “Enslaved people” names what was done to them instead of what they supposedly were. This isn’t a house style call. It’s the correct language, and the kind of correction that mainstream health outlets, staffed mostly by white editorial teams, still miss or ignore more often than not.

A little later in the same issue, “White” appeared next to an already-established capital-B “Black,” and I flagged it instead of deciding myself it should be lowercase. Same underlying instinct as the “Slaves” correction, expressed as a question instead of a fix, because the capitalization choice belonged to the editor of a Black-led publication, not to me.

The lifestyle magazine has no equivalent moment. Its readers don’t carry the specific weight that makes “enslaved people” a non-negotiable correction, because that history isn’t what the room is built around. I’m not going to manufacture a parallel example to prove I “did the same thing” in both places, because I didn’t. The terrain determined what needed catching.

Knowing when to leave it alone

The health magazine had a section in my editorial notes labeled “notable strengths”: sentences that were already doing what they needed to do, and where the correct edit was no edit at all. Restraint is a muscle most people don’t associate with line and copyediting, but it’s the tell that separates real editorial judgment from busywork. An editor who intervenes more on one audience’s writing “for its own good” is, by my definition, restraining less there too. Eventually that would show… as flattening.

In the lifestyle magazine, a food history piece described the postwar habit of making meat “stretch across several meals,” a correction I made to a line that had originally read “portion meat out.” Sharper verb, same meaning, small fix. On the same page, I left other sentences as the writer had them because they were already precise, and improving them further would have meant erasing what made them work.

Same rigor, different terrain

I don’t think equal treatment means identical edits. I think it means an attention that doesn’t downshift depending on who’s going to read the sentence, and doesn’t upshift into performance when the subject matter is heavy enough to seem like it deserves extra credit for trying. The Black health magazine needed me to know something about medical mistrust and the history sitting inside a single word. The lifestyle magazine needed me to track a writer’s architecture across an entire feature and hear where a comma changes what a sentence does. Different knowledge, same standard, applied without exception.

If you’re holding a finished manuscript and want one bounded read instead, the Opening Chapters Critique or a Full Manuscript Assessment are still there for that. But if you’re in the middle of building something and want an editor paying this kind of attention the whole way through, that’s what The Arc is for.

Inquire about The Arc

There are two versions of the piece you’re working on right now. Piece… meaning book, essay, poem, article, etc.

The first one came through fast. Maybe late at night. Maybe right after prayer, or a walk, or a conversation that created a lightbulb moment for you. You didn’t plan it. You just started writing and something moved through you that felt true in a way your usual writing doesn’t. Raw. Specific. Very honest. You read it back and thought: This da one. I wrote the hell outta this.

Then you sat with it for a day. Maybe two.

And then you opened the document and started editing.

Not tightening sentences. Not clarifying the purpose. Softening. You took out the sentence that called a spade a spade and replaced it with something that gestured toward it. You cut the paragraph where you said exactly what you meant because it felt “too much.” You read it back, nodded at how professional it sounded now and closed your laptop.

And somewhere in your body — your chest, your throat, the place between your shoulder blades — something went quiet that had been trying to speak.

That quiet sensation? That’s the silence wound.

Subscribe now

It Doesn’t Announce Itself

This is what makes the silence wound different from the other wounds we carry as writers.

The worthiness wound announces itself. You can hear it — who do you think you are to write this, nobody wants to read this, you’re not a real writer. It’s loud. It’s annoying. It’s exhausting. But at least you can identify it as a voice that’s lying to you.

And if you can’t recognize it as a lie yet… if that voice still sounds like the truth… that’s not a character flaw on your part. That’s how deep the wound goes. We’ll get to that.

The performance wound has a voice too. It’s the one micromanaging your word count, policing your consistency, telling you that real writers don’t take breaks and you’re already behind. Relentless, but still a voice you can argue with.

The silence wound doesn’t talk. It acts.

It’s already deleted the sentence before you knew you were going to delete it. It’s already added the disclaimer, softened the claim, translated the Ebonics into something more “neutral,” explained the cultural reference that your people don’t need explained — all before your conscious mind weighed in with an opinion. By the time you read the revised draft and think this feels kinda flat, the wound has already done its work.

It’s not a thought. It’s a reflex. And reflexes live in the body, not the mind.

What Your Body Learned

Your body learned that speaking your full truth has consequences.

Maybe it was a specific moment. The memoir you wrote that made your family go silent and give you side-eye at dinner. The op-ed you submitted to a newspaper that got called “too angry.” The time you said the true thing out loud and watched the room shift. Your nervous system catalogued that. And filed it under: this is what happens when you say too much.

Or maybe it wasn’t a singular moment. Maybe it was a slow accumulation, a thousand small corrections from writing teachers or facilitators who wanted your voice to sound more neutral, more formal, more like the “standard” that doesn’t account for how you think. A thousand tiny signals that the way you naturally speak and move and see the world needed to be dialed down and translated before it was acceptable.

Your body learned. And now it protects you the only way it knows how.

It makes the real version disappear before anyone can reject it.

The Two-Draft Life

I know this life from both sides.

As a developmental editor, I can see the silence wound in a manuscript from the first page. I know what it looks like when a writer has taken themselves out of their own work. The hedged claim where there should be a declaration. The paragraph that circles the true thing without ever landing on it. The sentence that was clearly written by someone who was feeling braver than the one who approved it for submission or publication. I’ve sat across from writers and said: the most potent sentence in this whole piece is the one you buried in the middle of page four. Why did you put it there? And I already knew the answer before they said anything

Then I switch hats after hours and do the exact same thing to my own writing.

Because I also know the other side. I write things that come through fast and true — channeled from Spirit, raw and way more direct than my polished voice usually goes. And then I go back. And the professionally trained editor in me takes over. Except she’s not editing anymore. She’s managing. I start sanding the piece down for the reader I don’t want to offend, taking the edge off every place that might cut, until nothing’s left that could reach the reader I’m actually writing for. I soften the statements that landed too hard. I hedge the claims that felt too authoritative or assertive. I translate the version of me that showed up first into something that feels safer to release into the world.

Some of that is craft, yes. Real revision is needed. You’re supposed to shape the raw material.

But there’s a specific kind of editing that isn’t craft. It’s fear wearing craft’s clothes. And the difference between the two lives in your body, not your brain. When you’re doing real revision, your body stays loose. Curious. A little excited. When the silence wound is running things, your chest gets tight. You’re not making the piece better — you’re flattening it. You’re taking yourself out of it.

What remains is technically cleaner. But it has no pulse.

The irony isn’t lost on me. I built a career helping writers find the truest version of their work. And yet I still get caught up in this tug of war at times — in my own body, in my own writing — to let my truest version stay on the page.

That’s how deep this wound goes. It doesn’t care how much knowledge about writing and/or editing you have. Or how long you’ve been on your writing journey. It cares how safe your body feels when doing these things. And nothing else.

What It’s Costing the Work

Here’s what the silence wound takes when it does its editing on your behalf:

It takes specificity. The most alive writing is always specific. It’s the named street, the exact phrase Big Mama used, the specific quality of light in the room when the event happened. The silence wound edits toward generalizations because general feels safer. General doesn’t name names. General can’t really be used against you. But general also doesn’t hit anybody in the chest.

It takes authority. The sentence that got deleted — the one where you said what you said without hedging it — that sentence knew what it was doing. The sentence that replaced it is still working up the nerve. Your reader can feel the difference. They don’t always know what they’re feeling to put it into words, but they know something shifted.

It takes the reader. This is the one that doesn’t get talked about enough. When you perform safety on the page, your reader — your real reader, the one you’re writing for — loses you. It’s not that they don’t understand the polished version. They understand it just fine. Trust me. But they came to your writing because they felt recognized in it. And when you edit yourself out, they stop feeling recognized. They keep reading, sure. But they’re reading alone now. Your presence is gone.

The silence wound doesn’t just cost you. It costs them too.

The Practice

You don’t bulldoze the wound. You don’t just “be brave” and publish the raw version unedited. That’s not writing from liberation. That’s swapping one extreme for another. And from an editor’s perspective, publishing raw, unedited content — whether it be a book, an op-ed, a Substack essay, etc. — is not the flex you think it is. It’s dumb. You can argue wit ya mama about it.

What you do is learn to feel the difference in your body between real revision and fear-based editing.

Real revision: your chest is open. You’re making intentional choices. You’re in the work. You’re in flow.

Fear-based editing: something in you goes tight. You’re not shaping the piece — you’re managing it. You’re getting smaller and the work is getting smaller with you.

When you feel that tightness, stop. Don’t push through it. Ask your body what it’s protecting you from. Ask: whose disapproval am I editing for right now? Who is the imagined reader I’m sanding this down for?

And then — not every time, but sometimes — you put the sentence back.

The First Draft Is Evidence

Here’s what I want you to sit with:

The fact that the first version came through the way it did — raw, specific, more honest than you usually let yourself be — that didn’t happen by chance. That’s your true voice when it’s not being managed.

It exists. You wrote it. Even if you buried it in a folder nobody will ever open. Even if you deleted it the same night you wrote it. It came through once, which means it can come through again.

The silence wound is not your true voice. It’s what learned to stand in front of your voice.

And underneath all that careful editing, all those softened sentences, all those deleted paragraphs… your real voice is still in there. Still trying to get out and be heard. Still writing the first draft in the middle of the night when your guard is down.

The work is to keep the door open long enough for it to come through.

As much as I adore a good metaphor, I’m not speaking metaphorically here. This type of work requires daily practice. It’s asking your body what it’s protecting before you hit delete. It’s putting the sentence back, even when your hands and your brain don’t want to. It’s learning — slowly, with evidence — that the truest version of your writing is the one worth fighting to keep on the page.

This is what Write From the Wound was created for.

Seven days of going underneath the silence wound — and a few others — to understand what it’s been holding, and to start writing from the place it’s been protecting.

It’s not about being fearless on the page. It’s about learning, slowly and with evidence, that your truest voice is worth fighting to keep there.

If the silence wound is what’s sitting between you and the piece you most need to write — this is where you begin.

Write From the Wound → $47. Seven days. Your first draft deserves to survive the second one.

Not because the writing is bad. From an editorial perspective, it’s technically fine — good sentences, clear structure, all the craft elements in place. But because they’ve sent me six versions of the same opening. Or their manuscript just stops at a certain point and suddenly “needs major reworking.” Or they keep asking me to look at revisions that actually don’t improve or strengthen the manuscript. They’re just different.

As an editor, I see this pattern all the time. And as a writer, I do it too.

That paragraph you’ve rewritten 47 times? The opening you can’t get right no matter how many times you start over? The scene that’s “almost perfect” but you keep tweaking one more time?

It’s not a craft problem.

You’re circling. Dancing around something. Using revision as a way to avoid writing what needs to be written.

And your body knows it. That’s why the work feels exhausting instead of energizing, like an uphill battle. That’s why you can spend three hours “revising” and somehow make it worse. And that’s why you keep starting over instead of moving forward.

You’re writing around the wound instead of from it.

Subscribe now

This is what it looks like when you’re revising to avoid instead of revising to improve:

The opening is “not quite right.” You’ve rewritten it fifty-leven times. Each version is different but none of them feel like the one. Because the one — the sentence that would open this story honestly — is the one you keep deleting. It’s too raw. Too direct. Too true.

You suddenly decide the structure needs changing. Right when you get to the part of the story that matters, you realize the whole thing should be in a different order. Or maybe it needs to be told from a different perspective. Or maybe you should add a framing device. Anything to avoid writing the scene you’re afraid of.

You “lose your voice” and need to “find it again.” Translation: your authentic voice showed up and it scared you. You said something too honest, too specific, too much like your true self. So you’re revising it back into something safer. Something softer. Something more acceptable. Something that sounds like what you think a “real writer” sounds like instead of what you truly sound like.

The compulsive tweaking never makes it better. You change a word. Then change it back. Move a paragraph. Move it back. Adjust the pacing. Adjust it again. You’re not improving anything. You’re just moving words around and staying busy so you don’t have to face what you’re avoiding.

You can’t finish. The closer you get to done, the more “problems” you find. The more it needs “just one more pass.” The more you convince yourself it’s not ready. Because finishing means choosing: am I really going to say this thing or not?

The folks who like to police our words and voices would say this is you being a perfectionist. It’s not. This also isn’t about you having high standards or a dedication to craft. I mean… you do, of course (I hope you do…). But that’s not what this is about.

This is protection. Your body using revision as a way to keep you safe from having to tell the truth.

Subscribe now

Writing Around vs Writing From

There’s a difference between writing around the wound and writing from it. And you can feel the difference in your body when you’re doing it.

Writing around the wound looks like this:

You write all the context. All the setup. All the surrounding details. You write beautifully crafted sentences that circle the actual subject without ever landing on it. You explain and analyze and describe everything except the thing itself.

The memoir about your mother never really says what she did. It talks around it — her childhood, the circumstances, the broader family dynamics. But the specific moment, the specific hurt, the specific truth? That stays buried under layers of context.

The story about your character’s trauma gives you all the aftermath, all the coping mechanisms, all the ways it shaped them. But the actual event? “Something happened that changed everything.” You gesture toward it but never show it.

The personal essay about your identity performs all the right analysis. You cite the theorists, you make the connections, you write with sophistication. But your actual lived experience, your actual feeling, your actual voice? Edited out. Too raw. Too unrefined. Too real.

Writing around the wound feels exhausting. Because you’re using all your energy to avoid the thing. You’re working so hard to write well while simultaneously making sure you never say what truly needs to be said. It’s like trying to drive with the parking brake on.

Writing from the wound looks different:

It’s the sentence that makes your stomach drop when you write it. The one you immediately want to delete because it’s too much, too honest, too exposed.

It’s the scene you’re afraid to write because once it’s on the page, you can’t unsee it. You can’t pretend it didn’t happen anymore.

It’s your true voice — not the performed version, not the “acceptable” version, but the one that sounds like you when you’re lying awake and talking to yourself at 3am.

It’s the specific truth instead of the general observation. The real feeling instead of the analyzed emotion. The thing you’re afraid someone will read and say “I can’t believe you wrote that.”

Writing from the wound feels terrifying. Your heart rate increases. Your throat gets tight. Your hands or underarms get sweaty. Your fingers want to stop moving. Your body says danger, danger, we shouldn’t be doing this.

But it also feels electric. Alive. Real.

When you write from the wound, you know you’re onto something. Even if it scares you. Especially if it scares you.

The distinction is simple: around the wound feels exhausting and flat. From the wound feels terrifying and true.

Share

The Reason We Write Around It

We are our ancestors. Their DNA literally lives within our bones and marrow.

Therefore, your body remembers and has learned that certain truths are dangerous.

Not metaphorically. You have real evidence of this.

Maybe from your own life — what happened the last time you were completely honest? Did someone get hurt or offended? Did you get punished? Did the relationship end? Did speaking up cost you something you couldn’t afford to lose?

Maybe from watching others — what happened to people who told their stories? Who spoke their truth? Who refused to stay quiet? Were they believed? Were they supported? Or were they gaslit and told to stop being dramatic, stop making things up, stop causing problems?

Your nervous system remembers. It catalogued those moments as data: telling the truth equals danger.

So when you sit down to write something true, your body says no. It’s not because you’re weak or afraid or lacking confidence. It’s because your body is doing exactly what it’s designed to do — protect you based on the information it has.

The revision loop is protection.

If you keep rewriting the opening, you never get to the middle where the real story lives. If you keep “fixing” the structure, you never have to write the scene that matters. If you never finish, you never have to decide: am I really going to tell this truth or not?

As long as you’re revising, you’re safe. Revision lives in the land of potential. You’re working toward something. You’re getting closer. But you haven’t exposed yourself yet. You haven’t told the truth yet.

The wound isn’t something you need to fix. The wound is your body trying to keep you safe.

And yes, sometimes that protection is still necessary. Sometimes speaking certain truths does have consequences you can’t afford. Sometimes your nervous system is right — it’s not safe yet.

But sometimes — and only you can know when — the danger your body remembers is old information. Information from a different time, a different situation, a different version of your life.

Your body might be protecting you from something that happened twenty years ago. Or protecting you the way it protected your mother, your grandmother, your ancestors who learned that silence meant survival. Remember, we are our ancestors.

The question isn’t so much “are you safe now?” The question is: “what is my body protecting me from, and is that protection still serving me in this specific moment, with this specific piece of writing?”

Sometimes the answer is yes — this truth isn’t safe to tell yet. Sometimes the answer is no — I’m circling something that can’t really hurt me anymore, but my body doesn’t know that yet.

Only you know which one is true for you.

You can’t force your way through this. Neither can you intellectualize your way out of it. You can’t simply “be braver” or “stop being so precious about your writing” or “get over it.”

That’s not how the nervous system works. That’s not how wounds work.

But you can start noticing. And noticing changes everything.

The next time you find yourself rewriting the same paragraph for the tenth time, pause. Ask yourself: what am I avoiding?

What’s the sentence I keep deleting?

What’s the truth I’m dancing around?

How would I write it if I wasn’t protecting myself from something?

Sometimes just naming it breaks the loop. You write the real sentence. Your body doesn’t combust. You survive the discomfort. Your nervous system gets new information: we can tell this truth and still be safe.

Sometimes you need more than that. Sometimes the wound is deeper, older, more tangled with survival than one brave sentence can address. Sometimes you need practices, tools and/or community support. Sometimes you need to do actual healing work before the writing can flow.

But it starts with noticing.

Where do you circle?

Is it always the opening? That might mean you’re afraid to really begin — to commit to this story being yours to tell.

Is it the middle? That might mean you’re avoiding the heart of the thing — the moment where something happened, where you felt something on a deep level, where the truth actually lives.

Is it right before the end? That might mean you’re afraid of what happens after you finish — when the work is done and you have to decide whether to share it or bury it.

What are you protecting yourself from?

Judgment? Rejection? Someone’s anger? Your own grief? The reality of what happened?

Intuitively, you know. Your body knows too. The tightness in your chest, the lump in your throat, the heaviness in your stomach, the sudden urge to do anything else — all of that is information.

Listen to it. Not to obey it and stay stuck. But to understand what it’s trying to protect you from.

Because once you understand the protection, you can start to gently — very gently — teach your body that it’s safe enough now to tell the truth.

Share

An Invitation

The revision loop will keep you stuck forever if you let it.

You can circle for years. Decades. Your whole writing life. Never quite finishing. Never quite saying the real thing. Always one more revision away from the truth.

Or you can start writing from the wound instead of around it.

Not by forcing. Not by being “braver” or “tougher” or pushing through resistance like it’s an enemy. That’s what productivity culture would tell you to do.

You start writing from the wound by understanding what you’re dealing with. By recognizing the pattern. By asking the questions: what am I avoiding? What am I protecting myself from? What would I write if I felt safe?

Start there. Just notice. Just ask.

And if you want to go deeper — if you’re ready to understand the specific wounds most writers carry and how they show up in your practice — I created something for you.

The 3 Wounds Blocking Your Writing is a free guide that introduces the patterns I see over and over in my work with writers: the Silence Wound (inherited protection that says speaking is dangerous), the Worthiness Wound (conditioning that says your voice needs approval) and the Performance Wound (the belief that you must constantly produce to deserve to call yourself a writer).

It’s not the full healing work. That takes time and practice and sometimes community support. But it’s the first step: recognition.

Understanding what’s happening. Seeing the pattern. Naming the wound.

You can sign up for the guide here:

GET THE GUIDE

Even without the guide, you have everything you need to start. The question alone is enough: are you writing around the wound or from it?

Your body already knows the answer.

Now it’s time to listen.

If this kind of writing guidance supports your creative and inner work, you can become a paid member of The Story Temple.

Paid subscribers help sustain this space and receive deeper teachings on shadow work and craft, elemental writing lessons, spiritual writing practices and invitations into community experiences.

The temple is built slowly, with care. You’re welcome to join when you’re ready.

Subscribe now

November is over.

You have a draft. Maybe it’s 50k words. Maybe it’s 35k words. Maybe it’s complete, maybe it ends mid-scene with a note that says “[FIGURE THIS OUT LATER].”

Whatever you have, it’s messy. It’s rough. It’s probably not what you envisioned when you started.

And now you’re wondering: what the hell do I do with this?

Let me tell you what NOT to do.

Do Not Start Revising Immediately

I know the impulse is strong.

You just spent 30 days writing at high speed. You can see all the problems. The plot holes. The inconsistent characterization. The scenes that don’t work. The dialogue that feels flat.

You want to fix it RIGHT NOW while it’s fresh.

Don’t.

Here’s why:

You’re exhausted. Your creative well is depleted. You’re too close to the work to see it objectively.

When you revise from exhaustion, you make decisions from scarcity instead of abundance. You cut things that actually work because you can’t see their value. You add things that don’t serve the story because you’re trying to force solutions instead of discovering them.

Revision requires different energy than drafting. Drafting is discovery. Revision is refinement. You can’t do both from the same depleted state.

You need rest first.

Not a day. Not a weekend. Actual rest. Two to four weeks minimum of not looking at this draft.

I know that feels impossible. I know you’re afraid if you step away you’ll lose momentum or forget important details or never come back to it.

But trust me: the time you invest in rest will save you months of ineffective revision.

What Rest Really Looks Like

Rest doesn’t mean doing nothing.

It means not actively working on THIS draft. It means giving your brain space to process what you learned without trying to fix anything yet.

Here’s what to do during your rest period:

Week 1-2: Complete Disconnect

Don’t open the file. Don’t read what you wrote. Don’t look at your notes. Don’t think about revision.

Do other things. Read books in your genre. Watch movies/shows. Take walks. Sleep. Spend time with people. Live your life. Let your creative well refill.

Your subconscious is processing everything you wrote. Let it work without interference. It doesn’t need your help.

Week 3-4: Gentle Reflection

Now you can start thinking about the draft again. But not from a “how do I fix this” place. From a “what did I learn” place.

Reflection questions to journal about:

• What surprised me about this story?

• What did I learn about my writing process?

• Which scenes felt alive when I was writing them?

• Which scenes felt forced or dead?

• What themes emerged that I didn’t plan?

• What does this story want to be underneath what I thought I was writing?

These questions help you see what you actually created instead of judging it against what you planned to create.

After 4 Weeks: Assessment Phase

NOW you’re ready to look at the draft with some objectivity.

Again, not to revise yet. To assess. To understand what you have and what it needs.

This is where elemental framework becomes essential.

Assessing What You Wrote

When you’re ready to look at your draft again, you need a systematic way to evaluate it.

Not “is this good or bad?” That’s not useful information. You need to know: what’s working, what’s not and what needs attention first.

This is where the four elements come in.

Air Element Assessment: Vision & Purpose

Questions to ask:

• Can I articulate what this story is about in one sentence?

• Do I have clear criteria for what belongs in this story and what doesn’t?

• What are the deeper themes underneath the plot events?

• Does my premise feel unique or generic?

• If someone else had my basic idea, would they write essentially the same story?

What you’re looking for: Conceptual clarity. The “true north” of your work.

If Air is weak: Your revision will wander. You’ll make changes without clear direction. You’ll second-guess every choice because you don’t know what your story is about.

If Air is strong: You have a compass for all other revision decisions. You know what serves your vision and what doesn’t.

Fire Element Assessment: Movement & Transformation

Questions to ask:

• Does this draft have forward momentum or does it stagnate?

• Where does the pacing drag despite me cutting words?

• What transforms by the end? (Characters, reader understanding, situation)

• Do the stakes escalate or stay flat?

• Can I identify the key turning points?

What you’re looking for: Energy and progression. The force that pulls readers through.

If Fire is weak: Readers will put your book down even if the writing is beautiful. Nothing compels them to continue reading.

If Fire is strong: The story has undeniable pull. People want to know what happens next.

Water Element Assessment: Emotion & Connection

Questions to ask:

• Do I care what happens to these characters? (If YOU don’t, readers won’t)

• Do the emotional moments land or fall flat?

• Does my voice feel authentic or am I performing?

• What relationships drive this story forward?

• Where do I feel genuine emotion vs where am I manufacturing it?

What you’re looking for: Authentic resonance. The beating heart of your work.

If Water is weak: Characters feel hollow. Emotional scenes don’t land. Readers observe but never invest.

If Water is strong: People remember your characters long after finishing. They FEEL the story.

Earth Element Assessment: Structure & Craft

Questions to ask:

• Does my structure support my vision or work against it?

• Where do readers stumble over awkward sentences or unclear organization?

• Are there technical errors undermining my authority?

• Do my scenes have solid architecture or do they meander?

• What craft-level “speed bumps” are preventing flow?

What you’re looking for: The foundation that holds everything together.

If Earth is weak: Brilliant ideas get lost in poor execution. Structure undermines vision instead of supporting it.

If Earth is strong: The craft disappears so the story can shine.

Creating Your Revision Roadmap

Once you’ve assessed all four elements, you need to prioritize.

You can’t fix everything at once. Trying to revise Air, Fire, Water and Earth simultaneously will overwhelm you and produce mediocre results.

Here’s the strategic order:

First Pass: Air Element

Get conceptually clear BEFORE you revise anything else.

If you don’t know what your story is about, you can’t make good decisions about what stays and what goes. You’ll waste time fixing scenes that don’t serve your vision.

Air work includes:

• Clarifying your premise

• Identifying your core themes

• Determining your unique angle

• Creating decision-making criteria for revision

Time investment: 1-2 weeks of thinking, journaling, clarity work

Outcome: You have a compass for all other revision decisions

Need help? Get your hands on my Air Element Workbooks. I have two versions: the 3-Level Story Concept workbook (fiction) and the 3-Level Content Clarity workbook (nonfiction). The cost is $37 each. If you can’t answer the Air assessment questions, do this work first.

Second Pass: Fire Element

Once you know what your story is about (Air), strengthen the momentum.

Fire work includes:

• Mapping energy through the manuscript

• Identifying where pacing drags or rushes

• Strengthening transformation arcs

• Building escalation and stakes

• Cutting or condensing scenes that kill momentum

Time investment: 2-4 weeks depending on manuscript length

Outcome: Your story has undeniable forward pull

Third Pass: Water Element

Now that you have clear vision (Air) and strong momentum (Fire), deepen the emotional resonance.

Water work includes:

• Strengthening character authenticity

• Deepening emotional arcs

• Finding your true voice (removing performance)

• Enhancing relationships and connection

• Making emotional moments land with impact

Time investment: 2-4 weeks

Outcome: Readers care deeply about what happens

Fourth Pass: Earth Element

Finally, with the vision clear (Air), the momentum strong (Fire) and the emotion resonant (Water), you polish the craft.

Earth work includes:

• Refining structure

• Sentence-level polish

• Eliminating speed bumps

• Tightening organization

• Technical precision

Time investment: 2-4 weeks

Outcome: Professional execution that lets your vision shine

Integration Pass: All Elements Together

One final read-through checking that all four elements work in harmony.

Time investment: 1-2 weeks

Outcome: A manuscript that’s ready for outside feedback

When to Get Outside Eyes

Not yet.

Seriously. Not after your first pass. Not even after your second.

Get outside feedback AFTER you’ve done at least Air and Fire revision work.

Why? Because if your premise is muddy (Air) or your pacing is off (Fire), beta readers will tell you things you already know. You’ll waste their time and yours getting feedback on problems you could have solved yourself. And if you decide to not bother with beta readers and go straight to an editor, not only will you waste your time, you’ll also waste your money.

The right time for outside feedback:

• After you have conceptual clarity (Air is strong)

• After you’ve fixed obvious momentum issues (Fire is functional)

• Before you spend months on line-level polish (Earth refinement)

What kind of feedback to get:

Developmental feedback: For big-picture issues. Story structure, character arcs, thematic resonance. This is what my Elemental Audit provides - elemental diagnosis of what your manuscript needs most.

Beta readers: For reader experience. Does this land? Is this compelling? Where did you lose interest?

Line editing: LAST. After everything else is working. Don’t polish sentences in scenes you might cut entirely.

Still not sure what feedback to get? Read: What Type of Editing Do You Actually Need? It will get you all the way together.

What If You Don’t Want to Revise This Draft?

Maybe you finished Novel November and realized: this isn’t the story I want to spend the next six months revising.

That’s valid.

Not every draft deserves extensive revision. Some drafts taught you what you needed to learn and that’s enough.

Questions to ask yourself:

Do I still care about this story? Not “should I care” - do you ACTUALLY care what happens to these characters?

Is this worth the time and money investment? Revision takes months. Maybe longer. Is this story worth that to you?

Am I avoiding revision because it’s hard or because the story isn’t right? There’s a difference between resistance (normal) and knowing this isn’t the project (also normal).

If the answer is “I don’t want to revise this”:

That’s okay. You can:

• Set it aside and start something new

• Mine it for parts (save scenes/characters you love for another project)

• Treat it as a learning draft (you discovered what doesn’t work)

• Come back to it later with fresh eyes

November’s goal was discovery. You discovered this might not be YOUR story. That’s valuable information.

The December Workshop: Reflection Before Revision

If you want guided support through this post-draft assessment phase, that’s what my December workshop is for.

The Post-Draft Reset: Reflection Before Revision - Friday, December 12 at 1pm ET with ProWritingAid

We’ll work through:

• Why rest before revision changes everything (and how long you really need)

• Elemental reflection practices to assess what you wrote

• Creating your strategic revision roadmap

• Knowing when to get outside feedback vs trust your own vision

• Using the post-draft period as creative renewal instead of punishment

The replay will be available in the Novel November Events space through December 31st, then moves to ProWritingAid’s Premium Library for continued access.

This workshop is for everyone - whether you “finished” November with 50k words or 30k. Whatever you created, this helps you figure out what to do with it.

Register for the workshop

If You Want Expert Elemental Assessment

When you’re ready for outside eyes (after you’ve rested and done your initial reflection), my Elemental Audit can tell you what each element needs most.

What you get:

• Complete four-element assessment of your opening chapters (up to 10k words)

• Air analysis: Is your premise clear? Does your opening establish conceptual direction?

• Fire analysis: Does your opening have momentum? Are you starting in the right place?

• Water analysis: Do readers care about your protag immediately? Is there authentic connection?

• Earth analysis: Are craft-level issues preventing flow?

• Prioritized revision guidance: Which element to strengthen first and why

Investment: $397

Understand that this is diagnostic work. I’m not pointing out spelling errors or correcting your grammar. I’m telling you what your manuscript needs most so you’re not guessing during revision.

Spots are limited. If you want feedback on the opening chapters of your November draft before the new year, get in touch with me to book your audit now.

Or: Just One Specific Question

Maybe you don’t need or want a full assessment. Maybe you just have one specific question or challenge keeping you stuck.

Manuscript Clarity Session: $147 for 45 minutes

Bring one specific problem:

• Is my premise working?

• Why does this scene feel off?

• Should I keep this subplot or cut it?

• Is this the right point of view character?

• What does my opening need most?

I apply my elemental framework and editorial wisdom to your specific challenge. You leave with clear direction.

You get the recorded session plus a follow-up email with key points.

Book a clarity session. Once you’ve booked your session, I will update the meeting invitation with a zoom link. Me and google meet do not get along.

Re: Messy Drafts…

Every published book you’ve ever loved was once a messy draft.

Every author you admire went through this exact phase - staring at a rough manuscript wondering if it would ever work.

They all finished the messy draft. Then at some point they rested. Then they assessed. Then they revised strategically.

That’s the process. There’s no shortcut. Sorry not sorry.

Your Novel November draft is what it’s supposed to be: raw material containing the bones of your story.

Now you rest. Then you reflect. Then you revise.

In that order. Without skipping steps.

You did the hard part. You created something from nothing. You showed up for 30 days and wrote.

Now honor that work by giving it the rest and reflection it deserves before you try to fix anything.

Your story will still be there in January. And you’ll be able to see it clearly by then.

Rest first. Revise later.

Where are you in the post-draft process? Still resting? Starting to reflect? Ready for assessment? Share in the comments.

Leave a comment

You made it to the final week. Take a deep breath cuz the finish line is literally in sight.

Whether you’re at 45k words or 25k words. Whether you’re racing toward the finish line or limping toward it. Whether your story feels complete or like it’s barely begun.

You made it here. That’s all that matters.

This is the final week. Seven days left. And I need to tell you something important about finishing…

Your Ending Doesn’t Have to Be Perfect

Let me say that again for the folks in the back:

Your ending doesn’t have to be perfect.

It doesn’t have to resolve every plot thread. It doesn’t have to tie up everything neatly in a bow. It doesn’t have to feel satisfying or complete or polished.

It just has to exist.

You’re finishing a DRAFT, not a book. You’re completing a discovery process, not creating a final product.

Sidebar: If you’re one of those who plans on publishing their DRAFT once NovNov is over, imma look you sideways.

The purpose of Novel November was never to write a publishable novel. It was to write 50k words of messy, imperfect, alive discovery.

If your ending is rough? Good. That’s what rough drafts are for.

If your ending is just a sketch of what will eventually happen? Perfect. You can flesh it out in revision.

If your ending is literally “[FIGURE THIS OUT LATER]” and you keep writing anyway? You have not failed. This is understanding what drafting actually is.

The goal is DONE, not PERFECT.

Done means you showed up consistently for 30 days and created something that didn’t exist before. Done means you have raw material to work with. Done means you learned what your story actually is underneath your plans.

Perfect is a revision goal. Done is a drafting goal.

Don’t confuse the two.

What “Finishing” Actually Means

Finishing doesn’t mean you wrote exactly 50k words.

Finishing doesn’t mean your story has a satisfying conclusion.

Finishing doesn’t even mean you wrote THE END at the bottom of your manuscript.

Finishing means you did what you set out to do: you showed up for this challenge and you created.

If you wrote 30k words and discovered your premise needs to change, you finished. You completed the discovery process.

If you wrote 45k words and ran out of story, you finished. You learned how much story you actually have.

If you wrote 50k words and half of them will get deleted in revision, you finished. That’s what rough drafts are supposed to produce.

If you pivoted to a different project mid-month and wrote 25k words of something you truly care about, you finished. You honored your creative truth.

The number is arbitrary. The word count is a tool for motivation, not a measurement of worth.

Despite what some may say, this is what really matters:

Did you show up? Did you write when it was hard? Did you push through doubt and comparison and exhaustion? Did you learn something about your story or your process or yourself?

Then you finished. Regardless of the word count.

Pacing the Final Week Without Burning Out

Week four energy is tricky.

Some of you are feeling that final sprint energy — the finish line is in sight and you’re ready to push hard to cross it.

Others are completely depleted — you’ve been running on fumes for days and you’re just trying to survive until November 30th.

Both are valid. Both require different approaches.

I’m feeling a mix of both energies myself.

Being a Novel November Ambassador has been fulfilling and so much fun. Supporting y’all through this challenge, creating these weekly pieces, showing up in the community, replying to your emails — it’s lit me up in ways I didn’t expect.

But it’s also been energetically taxing. I’ve been holding space for hundreds of writers while also managing my own work, my own creative practice, my own life. So I’m tired too.

I say this because I want you to know: even the person supporting you is navigating the same exhaustion. Even the person writing these pieces about stamina and rest needs to follow her own advice.

We’re all tired by week four. We aren’t weak. This is simply what happens when you show up consistently for something ambitious that has meaning for you.

If You Have Sprint Energy

Use it strategically. Don’t blow all your energy on Monday and crash by Wednesday.

Plan your sprint days: Which 3-4 days this week do you have the most time and energy? Those are your big word count days. Aim for 2,500-3,000 words on those days.

Plan your rest days: Which days do you have other obligations or just need to recover? Write your minimum on those days (500-800 words) or take them off entirely.

Don’t sacrifice sleep to hit word count. You’ll write faster and better when you’re rested. One good night’s sleep is worth more than two extra hours of exhausted drafting. Trust me!

Celebrate along the way. Every 10k words, every milestone, every small win. Don’t wait until you hit 50k to acknowledge what you’re accomplishing.

If You’re Running on Fumes

Lower your daily goal. If 1,667 words feels impossible, aim for 1,000. Or 800. Or whatever you can actually sustain.

Write only what has energy. Skip the scenes that feel dead. Write what wants to be written, even if it’s out of order.

Rest is not optional. If your body is begging for a day off, take it. Burning out completely in week four means you won’t finish at all.

Consider finishing at 40k or 45k. The number doesn’t matter. What matters is that you created something substantial. If your story ends at 42k words, that’s where it ends. Don’t add filler just to hit an arbitrary goal.

Give yourself credit for what you’ve already done. You wrote through three brutal weeks. You kept showing up when most people quit. That’s significant creative work.

The Truth About Messy Drafts

Every published book you’ve ever read was once a messy draft.

Every author you admire went through this exact phase - the moment where everything feels broken and you’re not sure it will ever come together. I’ve never understood why some people don’t believe the authors we admire didn’t have a starting point. Like their books just materialized fully formed.

They all started with a messy draft. Then they revised it. Sometimes extensively. Sometimes multiple times. Until eventually it became the polished book you read.

Your messy draft isn’t a failed perfect draft. It’s doing exactly what it’s supposed to do: giving you raw material to shape during revision.

The mess is the medium through which you discover what your story actually is. You can’t skip this phase. You can only embrace it.

So stop judging your rough draft against published books. Stop comparing your beginning to someone else’s ending. Stop expecting first-draft perfection from a discovery process.

Write it messy. You’ll make it beautiful later.

What Comes After: The Post-Draft Reset

Here’s what NOT to do on December 1st: immediately start revising.

You’ll be exhausted. You’ll be too close to the work to see it clearly. You’ll make revision decisions from depletion instead of clarity.

What to do instead: REST.

Take at least two weeks completely away from your manuscript. Longer if you can. Give your creative well time to refill. Give your brain space to process what you learned.

Then, before you revise, you need reflection.

Not diving back in with a red pen. Not immediately “fixing” what feels broken. But actual reflection on:

• What worked in this draft and what didn’t

• What your story is actually about underneath the plot events

• What each element (Air, Fire, Water, Earth) needs most

• Where to focus your revision energy for maximum impact

This is what my December workshop is for.

The Post-Draft Reset: Reflection Before Revision

December 12th at 1pm ET with ProWritingAid

I’ll guide you through:

• Why rest before revision changes everything

• Elemental reflection practices to assess your strongest and weakest elements

• Creating your revision roadmap (based on your assessment)

• Knowing when to get outside feedback vs trust your own vision

• Using the post-draft period as creative renewal, not punishment

The replay will be available in the Novel November Events space through December 31st, then it moves to ProWritingAid’s Premium Pro Workshop Library for continued access. (Meaning you’ll have to invest in their subscription service to access it, along with the other replays from the event, after December 31st.)

Whether you “finished” Novel November or not, this workshop helps you figure out what to do with whatever you created.

RSVP for the workshop here - you have to be a Novel November participant to attend.

Self-Care: Crossing the Finish Line Without Collapsing

This week, your body needs:

Before you write: Check in honestly. How much energy do you actually have today? Not how much you think you “should” have.

Write from that truth. If you have two hours of focus, use them. If you have thirty minutes, use that. Don’t force more than your body can give.

During writing: Notice when you hit your real limit. Stop there. Pushing past depletion doesn’t make you disciplined. It makes you depleted.

After you finish (whenever that is): CELEBRATE.

Not in a week. Not after you’ve rested. Right then, when you type the last word.

Close your laptop. Put your hand on your heart. Say out loud: “I did this.”

Let yourself feel that accomplishment. Let your body register the completion. This matters.

Then rest. For real.

Take December completely off from this manuscript. No reading it. No editing it. No “just fixing this one scene.” Literally leave it alone. And in case you’re wondering, no, you won’t need your actual manuscript for the workshop.

Let it rest. Let yourself rest. You both earned it.

Plan your celebration NOW: What are you doing on December 1st to mark this accomplishment? Not writing. Not working. What brings you joy?

Schedule it. Put it on the calendar. Make it real.

You showed up for 30 days. You deserve to celebrate that.

The Final Push

Seven days left.

You’re tired. Your story is messy. You might not hit 50k words. You might not have a complete story. Your ending might be rough or missing entirely.

None of that changes what you’ve already accomplished.

You showed up. Day after day, week after week, even when it was hard. Even when you wanted to quit. Even when everyone else’s word count made you question yourself.

You created. The bones of a book that didn’t exist 23 days ago. Characters who came to life on the page. Scenes you discovered by writing them. A story that’s teaching you what it wants to be.

You learned. About your process. About your stamina. About what works and what doesn’t. About your story underneath your outline.

That’s the real win. Not the word count. Not whether you “finished.” The showing up and creating and learning.

Seven more days. You can do seven more days. I can do seven more days.

Write imperfectly. Write messily. Write whatever comes out.

Just write.

And when November 30th ends — whether you hit 50k or 30k or 45k — celebrate what you did. Twerk if you want to.

You made it through Novel November. That’s a big deal.

You finished. However that looks for you.

I’m proud of you.

Now go write your messy, imperfect, beautiful ending.

What does finishing mean to you? What are you celebrating on December 1st? Share in the comments.

Leave a comment

If you want elemental guidance on what you’ve written:

My Elemental Audit assesses your opening chapters (up to 10k words) and tells you what each element needs most for revision.

Complete an intake form and let’s talk about whether this offer is right for you.

Or if you have one specific question about your draft: Manuscript Clarity Session - $147

Either way, wait until you’ve rested. Your post-November self will make better decisions than your exhausted November self.

Welcome to week three.

This is the week that breaks people.

Not because the writing gets harder. Or because the word count goal becomes impossible. Not even because of some external obstacle that shows up out of nowhere. (Shit happens sometimes.)

Week three breaks people because this is when the truth becomes undeniable: you’re tired, the initial excitement is dead and the finish line is still too far away to pull you forward.

The honeymoon phase of Novel November is over. You’re in the long middle now. The part where motivation can’t fully carry you anymore and you have to show up on discipline alone.

And discipline is exhausting when you’re already tired.

So let’s talk about what’s really happening in week three and how to tell the difference between “I need rest” and “I need to stop.”

Why Week Three Breaks People

You started November with the ace of wands — fire. New project energy. The thrill of a challenge. The promise of 50k words in 30 days.

That carried you through week one easily. Week two may have been a bit harder but you were still riding some of that momentum.

Now it’s week three and you’ve hit the wall. That fire is starting to burn out.

The excitement is gone. Writing feels like a chore instead of an adventure. You’re not discovering exciting new scenes anymore. You’re grinding through the messy middle where everything feels muddy and unclear.

The finish line isn’t motivating right now. You’re not close enough to the end to feel that final sprint energy. November 30 is still two weeks away. That might as well be forever when you’re exhausted.

You’re legit tired. Not metaphorically or figuratively like some people may claim. But physically. Mentally. Creatively. Two weeks of sustained output takes a toll. Your body needs rest. Your brain needs space. Your creative well needs refilling.

The story feels like a mess. Of course it does. You’ve been discovery drafting at high speed. You haven’t had time to step back and see the whole picture. You’re too close to it. Everything looks broken when you’re this deep in it.

This is normal. This is expected. This is the actual challenge of Novel November.

The word count goal is arbitrary. The real test is whether you can keep showing up when it stops being fun.

The Two Questions That Matter

When week three hits and you want to quit, you need to figure out what kind of tired you’re dealing with.

Because there are two different types of tired. And they require opposite responses.

Question 1: Am I Tired or Am I Done?

Tired means: You still care about this story. You still want to know what happens to these characters. You’re just exhausted from the pace and need rest.

When you think about abandoning this draft, you feel sad. Disappointed. Like you’d be letting yourself down or giving up on something that matters.

That’s tired. That’s your body saying “I need a break” not “I need to quit.”

Done means: You genuinely don’t care what happens next. These characters don’t interest you anymore. The story feels hollow. When you think about stopping, you feel relief.

That’s done. That’s your intuition saying “this isn’t the story I thought it was” or “this isn’t worth the energy I’m spending on it.”

How to tell the difference:

Close your eyes. Imagine it’s December 1.

Scenario A: You abandoned your draft halfway through November. How do you feel? Relieved? Or regretful?

Scenario B: You pushed through and finished a messy 50k-word draft. How do you feel? Proud? Or resentful that you wasted time on something you didn’t care about?

Your gut knows the answer. Your body will tell you if you ask it.

If thinking about quitting makes you sad, you’re just tired. Rest and keep going.

If thinking about quitting makes you relieved, you might actually be done. And that’s okay too.

Question 2: Is This Resistance or Is This Wrong?

This is trickier because resistance and genuine misalignment can feel similar.

Resistance means: You’re scared of the next scene. You don’t know how to write it well. You’re afraid it won’t work. So your brain is creating reasons to stop before you have to face that hard moment.

Resistance feels like avoidance. Like procrastination. Like suddenly every other task becomes more urgent than writing this scene.

When you push through resistance and write the scary scene anyway, you usually discover it wasn’t as hard as you thought. And you feel satisfied afterward, even if the writing is rough.

Wrong means: Your gut is telling you this story doesn’t work. Not that this scene is hard, but that the whole premise is off. You’re trying to force something that isn’t true to the story.

Wrong feels like pushing a boulder uphill. Like you’re working against the natural flow of the narrative. Like you’re trying to make the characters do things they wouldn’t actually do.

When you push through “wrong” and force yourself to write it anyway, you feel worse afterward. Drained. Frustrated. Disconnected from your work.

How to tell the difference:

Ask yourself: Am I avoiding one specific difficult moment? Or does the entire story feel misaligned?

If it’s one scene - that’s resistance. Write it badly. Skip it and come back. Do whatever you need to do to get past it.

If it’s the whole story - that might be wrong. And you might need to listen to that.

If You’re Just Tired: Strategies for Pushing Through

Let’s say you’ve asked yourself these questions and the answer is clear: you’re tired, not done. You care about this story. You just need help making it through week three.

Here’s how.

Lower Your Daily Word Count

You don’t have to write 1,667 words every day.

You can write 1,000 words a day and still hit 50k by month’s end if you write every day. You can write 1,200 words a day and have some cushion for days you don’t write at all.

The daily goal is arbitrary. What matters is forward momentum.

If you’re exhausted and 1,667 feels impossible, aim for 800. Or 500. Or 300. Who’s gonna check you? The Novel November police? They don’t exist.

Something is always better than nothing. And 300 words of actual progress beats zero words because you were too overwhelmed to start.

Permission granted: Adjust your daily goal to something sustainable. You’re not failing. You’re adapting.

Write the Scenes You’re Excited About

Skip the boring parts.

Seriously. If you’re dreading the next scene in your outline, don’t write it. Write the scene three chapters ahead that you’re actually excited about.

You’re discovery drafting. The whole point is to follow what has energy. If a scene feels dead before you even write it, it’s probably dead to your reader too.

Write what lights you up right now. You can fill in the connective tissue later. Or you might discover those “necessary” scenes weren’t really necessary at all.

Permission granted: Follow your energy, not your outline. Write what wants to be written.

Talk to Someone About Your Story

Not for feedback. Not for critique. Just to remember why you care.

Call a friend. Voice text someone. Chat to me in the comments. Talk out loud to yourself if you have to.

Tell them about your main character. What they want. What’s in their way. Why you’re writing this story.

Sometimes you just need to hear yourself talk about the work to reconnect with why it matters. To remember that underneath the exhaustion, there’s something here worth finishing.

Permission granted: You don’t have to do this alone. Connection can reignite your fire.

Remember: Messy Drafts Are THE POINT

You’re not writing a publishable novel in November. You’re writing a messy, imperfect, alive-first draft that contains the bones of your story.

Every published book you’ve ever read went through this phase. The messy middle. The moment where the author wanted to quit. The draft that felt like it would never come together.

They all pushed through. They finished the messy draft. Then they revised it into something beautiful.

You’re not behind. You’re not doing it wrong. You’re exactly where you’re supposed to be: in the uncomfortable middle of creation.

Permission granted: Stop judging your rough draft against published books. That’s not a fair comparison.

If You’re Actually Done: Permission to Pivot

Now let’s talk about the other scenario.

You’ve asked yourself the questions. You’ve sat with it. And the answer is clear: you’re done with this story. Not tired. Done.

Maybe you started with the wrong premise. Maybe these characters aren’t who you thought they were. Maybe the story revealed itself to be something different than what you wanted to write.

That’s not failure. That’s information. Use it.

You have three options:

Option 1: Pivot to a Different Story

Yes, you can start a new project in the middle of November. I’ve seen people do this successfully.

Count the words you’ve already written toward your 50k-word goal. They still happened. They still count as creative output.

Then start fresh with something that has your energy. You might be surprised how fast the words come when you’re writing something you actually care about.

Option 2: Reimagine This Story

Maybe the story isn’t wrong. Maybe it’s your approach that’s wrong.

What if you told it from a different character’s perspective? What if you changed the genre? What if you rewrote the premise to reflect what the story truly wants to be instead of what you planned?

You can keep the bones of what you’ve written and shift the direction. That’s not cheating. That’s creative problem-solving. A skill many writers need to learn.

Option 3: Walk Away Completely

Sometimes the bravest thing is to stop.

Not because you failed. Not because you’re weak. But because you’ve learned something valuable: this story doesn’t serve you right now.

Maybe you’ll come back to it later with fresh eyes. Maybe you won’t. Either way, you spent two weeks learning what doesn’t work. That’s not wasted time. That’s part of the process.

The truth: Finishing isn’t always the goal. Discovering what you DON’T want to write is just as valuable as discovering what you do.

A note about this challenge in general:

Novel November is a wonderful experience. And I think every writer should try fast drafting at least once. But it would be remiss of me not to keep it real: the writing world can make this challenge toxic as hell.

People shame those who don’t finish. They treat 50k words like some sacred threshold that separates “real” writers from failures. They turn what should be a supportive creative container into a competition where anything less than complete victory is worthless.

That’s bullshit.

The goal isn’t finishing with exactly 50k words. The goal is discovery. Making progress. Learning what your story actually is. Finding out what works and what doesn’t in a defined container with community support.

If you write 30k words and discover your premise needs to change, that’s still success. You learned something crucial about your story.

If you write 15k words and realize this isn’t the project you want to spend your energy on right now, that’s not quitting. That’s honoring your creative truth. There are a lot of writers who don’t honor their creative truth. No shade, but it’s true.

If you write 50k words and half of them are garbage you’ll delete in revision, you still did it right. That’s exactly what rough drafts are for.

The number is arbitrary. The discovery is what matters.

So if you decide to pivot, walk away or finish with 40k words instead of 50k, you haven’t failed this challenge. You’ve used it exactly as it’s meant to be used: as a container for creative exploration.

Don’t let anyone shame you for that. Including yourself.

Self-Care: When Your Body Says Stop

Your body will tell you when to rest. The question is whether you’re listening.

Before you write: Ask your body what it needs today. Not what you think it should need. What it actually needs.

Does it need gentle movement before you sit down to write? Does it need food first? Does it need ten minutes of complete stillness?

Honor what comes up. Your body knows.

During writing: Notice when you hit your actual limit. Not your imaginary limit (the one saying you should be able to write for three hours). Your real limit.

Maybe you can only focus for 45 minutes today. That’s your limit. Write for 45 minutes, then stop.

Pushing past your body’s real limits doesn’t make you disciplined. It makes you depleted.

After writing: Celebrate what you did, not what you didn’t do.

You wrote 400 words instead of 1,667? You still wrote 400 words that didn’t exist before.

You only worked for 30 minutes instead of two hours? You still showed up for 30 minutes.

Progress is progress. Stop measuring yourself against an imaginary standard.

Rest days are allowed. Yes, even during November. Especially during November.

If your body is screaming for rest and you keep pushing, you’ll burn out completely. Then you won’t finish anyway.

One rest day now might save you from three lost days later. That’s not slacking off. That’s strategy.

The practice: Check in with your body before, during and after writing. Trust what it tells you. Adjust accordingly.

The Truth About Week Three

This week is hard because it’s supposed to be hard.

You’re doing something ambitious. You’re creating at a pace that pushes your limits. You’re discovering your story while simultaneously trying to get it on the page.

That’s exhausting work. Of course you’re tired.

But you’re also capable. Two things can in fact be true at the same time.

You’ve already written x-number of words. You’ve shown up every day even when it wasn’t fun. You’ve pushed through resistance and doubt and comparison. I’m reading your comments and reflections and seeing it all.

Week three doesn’t break you because you’re not strong enough. Week three breaks people who stop believing they can finish.

Don’t stop believing. Not yet. Hold the line.

You’re closer than you think. Week four is going to feel different. The finish line will come into view. The final sprint energy will kick in. Knight of wands energy.

But you have to make it through week three to get there.

What’s Coming: Week 4

Next Sunday’s piece is about finishing imperfectly: why your ending doesn’t have to be perfect, how to pace the final week without burning out and what to do when you cross the finish line.

But first, focus on the now and get through this week.

So here’s my advice: Lower your expectations. Increase your self-care. Stop judging your rough draft. And keep showing up.

Even if you only write 200 words today. Even if you skip a day and rest. Even if all you do is stare at the page and eventually type one sentence.

Keep showing up.

You’re not done yet. And you’re closer than you think.

So… are you tired or are you done? Share in the comments. Sometimes naming it helps clarify the answer.

Leave a comment

If you’re feeling like you need to pivot or your premise isn’t working:

Sometimes the story you planned isn’t the story that wants to be written. If you’re realizing your premise needs work or you’re considering a pivot to a different project, my Air Element workbooks can help you gain clarity before you keep drafting.

For fiction writers: 3-Level Story Concept Workbook - $37
Clarify what your story is actually about beyond plot events, develop your unique premise and find your thematic north star.

For nonfiction writers: 3-Level Content Clarity Workbook - $37
Define your central message, identify your unique angle and build the intellectual framework that organizes your content.

Air clarity now saves you months of revision later. If your gut is telling you something’s off with your premise, listen to that. These workbooks help you figure out what needs to shift.

You’re 3,000 words into today’s session.

The story is flowing. Your main character just made a choice that surprised you. You’re in that beautiful zone where the words are coming faster than you can think them. Many call this the flow state.

Then you notice it.

That clunky sentence from paragraph two. The one that’s been sitting there like a pebble in your shoe since you wrote it twenty minutes ago.

Just one quick fix, you tell yourself.

Thirty minutes later you’ve rewritten the entire opening of today’s session. Your word count is DOWN instead of up. The flow is gone. You’re exhausted from wrestling with revision instead of drafting. And you still have x-number of words left to hit whatever goal you set for yourself today.

Sound familiar?

The urge to edit during fast drafting isn’t a character flaw. It’s not evidence that you lack discipline or don’t understand how drafting works.

It’s your nervous system trying to control an inherently messy process.

Editing while drafting is like trying to decorate a room before you’ve figured out how people will actually move through the space.

I studied interior design before I became a paralegal, which wasn’t very fun (the paralegal part), and now I’m an editor. This isn’t to be confused with interior decorating — they are two completely different disciplines. Interior decorating focuses on aesthetics - making spaces look pretty. Interior design focuses on function - how people move through a space, what they need from it, how form serves purpose. — Notes from EWM 401

Your writing works the same way. Right now you’re trying to make your manuscript look pretty (decoration) when what you need to be doing is building architecture that serves how readers will experience your story (design).

Decoration comes after you understand the structure. Not before.

Why Your Brain Wants to Edit

Your inner editor isn’t trying to sabotage you. I need you to understand that first.

It’s trying to protect you from the vulnerability of messy creation.

Here are three reasons the editing urge hits hardest during fast drafting:

(1) Fear of failure. Bad sentences feel like evidence you’re not a “real” writer. If you can fix them immediately, you can prove to yourself (and anyone who might read this draft) that you know better. That you’re capable of good writing even when you’re writing fast.

The problem? You already know you can write well. This draft isn’t about proving that. It’s about discovery.

And yes, this applies to plotters too. Even with an outline, you’re still discovering how scenes actually unfold, what characters actually say, how the story actually feels on the page.

(2) Perfectionism as safety. A perfectly polished sentence feels safe. Controlled. Manageable. A rough draft sentence feels exposing. Vulnerable. Out of your control.

Your brain prefers safe. It will always choose the illusion of control over the reality of creative mess.

But the mess is where the magic happens. The mess is where you find what you didn’t know you were looking for.

(3) Control during chaos. Fast drafting is inherently chaotic. You’re discovering as you go, following characters where they lead, writing scenes before you fully understand their purpose.

Editing gives the illusion you’re managing the chaos. That you’re making sense of things as you create them.

Except you’re not. You’re just interrupting the discovery process to impose premature order on something that isn’t ready for order yet.

Here’s what your inner editor doesn’t understand: messy drafts aren’t failed perfect drafts. They’re doing their actual job.

A first draft’s purpose isn’t beauty. It’s discovery.

I don’t believe “the first draft of anything is shit” like Hemingway said. I get the sentiment. He’s trying to give permission for imperfection. But that framing is part of the problem. When you believe your first draft will be shit, of course you want to edit while you write. Who wants to deliberately create shit?

Your first draft isn’t shit. It’s messy discovery. There’s a difference.

You’re finding the story, not presenting it. You’re learning what you’re actually writing about. The mess is the medium through which the real story reveals itself.

When you edit while drafting, you’re asking yourself to simultaneously discover AND refine. Your brain can’t do both well at the same time. So you end up doing neither - stuck in a loop of endless tweaking that kills momentum without actually improving the work.

The elemental reality: This is an Earth element problem showing up too early.

Earth is structure, craft, polish and technical mastery. Earth is for AFTER you’ve discovered what Air, Fire and Water have revealed. Earth’s job is to make the vision (Air) accessible, to give form to the emotion (Water), to structure the momentum (Fire).

But trying to apply Earth structure before the other elements have done their discovery work? That’s the same as picking out paint colors and furniture before you’ve figured out how the room will actually be used. You’re decorating before you’ve designed. And that never works.

What Editing While Drafting Costs You

Every time you stop drafting to edit, you pay a tax. Multiple taxes, actually.

Momentum tax. You lose the creative flow state. And it’s expensive to get back.

Research shows it takes 15-20 minutes to return to deep focus after an interruption. That “clunky sentence” you quickly fixed? It just cost you 30 minutes of productive drafting time. Maybe more if you spiraled into editing multiple paragraphs.

Do that three times in a session and you’ve lost 90 minutes to revision that could have been spent drafting. That’s half your writing time gone.

Confidence tax. When you constantly judge your rough draft against polished prose — whether that’s your own revised work or published books you admire — you reinforce the belief that your natural writing isn’t good enough.

This erodes trust in your creative instincts. It teaches you that your first impulses are wrong, that you can’t trust what emerges on the page without immediate correction.

Over time, this makes drafting harder. You second-guess every sentence before you finish writing it. You freeze up because you’re trying to get it perfect the first time.

That’s not how creativity works. That’s not how discovery happens.

Discovery tax. This is the most expensive cost, and the one writers don’t recognize until it’s too late.

You never get to see where that “bad” sentence was actually leading.

Maybe it was clunky because you were inching toward something your conscious mind hadn’t articulated yet. Maybe the awkwardness was your intuition trying to break through with something true but unpolished.

Maybe if you’d kept writing past that rough sentence, the next three paragraphs would have clarified what you were actually trying to say. But you never got there because you stopped to fix the imperfect beginning.

I’ve seen this happen with countless writers during this challenge and in my editing work year-round. They spend entire sessions “fixing” their opening chapter instead of moving forward. They finish the month with 12,000 beautifully polished words and no story momentum. No middle. No ending. No discovery of what their book wanted to be.

Meanwhile, writers who allowed themselves to draft messily discovered their actual story. They finished with 50,000 words that - yes - need significant revision. But those words contain the living heart of their book. The bones are there. The discovery happened.

Which writer would you rather be?

The one with a polished fragment? Or the one with a messy complete draft that knows what it’s about?

Strategies That Work

Knowing you shouldn’t edit while drafting is one thing. Stopping yourself from doing it is another.

Here are four strategies for when willpower ain’t enough:

Strategy 1: The Messy Draft Permission Slip

Before each writing session, open a new document or grab a sticky note. Write at the top: “This draft is supposed to be messy. That’s its job.”

Read it out loud. Let your nervous system hear that mess is the GOAL, not a problem to fix.

This isn’t a cute affirmation. You’re retraining your brain’s threat response. When your inner editor starts mouthing off about how terrible a sentence is, you have explicit permission to ignore it.

The draft is SUPPOSED to be terrible. You’re doing it right.

Strategy 2: The [FIX LATER] Bracket

When you write a sentence that makes you cringe — and you will write many of these — don’t revise it.

Put [FIX LATER] after it and keep moving.

That’s it. Acknowledge the problem. Make a note for Future You. Keep drafting.

This works because it addresses your inner editor’s concern without letting it take the reins and derail your momentum. You’re saying “I see you, we’ll handle this, but not now.”

You’re making a promise to deal with the clunky sentence during revision when you have the proper tools and perspective for refinement. Future You, who has a complete draft and can see the whole story, is way better equipped to fix that sentence than Present You, who’s still discovering what happens next.

Listen, I love what I do for a living. Truly. But being a well-trained editor is a double-edged sword. It’s hard as hell to turn my editor brain off when I’m drafting. Making peace with my inner editor is a requirement for me because she can be brutal. The [FIX LATER] bracket is how I survive my own first drafts.

Strategy 3: The Ten-Minute Sprint

Set a timer for ten minutes. Write without stopping, without rereading, without correcting anything. Not even obvious typos.

Just forward motion for ten minutes.

When the timer rings, you have two choices:

Keep going if you’re in flow. Ride that momentum as far as it takes you.

Or pause, glance back (NOT to edit, just to orient yourself), and start another ten-minute sprint.

This works because ten minutes feels manageable. Your inner editor can handle ten minutes of mess without panicking. And once you’re ten minutes in, the flow often carries you further. Mine nags the hell outta me, but even she can handle ten minutes.

Strategy 4: Separate Your Drafting Tool

Write your rough draft in a different application than where you normally write.

Use a basic text editor with no formatting options. Use a notebook and physically write by hand. Use voice-to-text and speak your draft instead of typing it.

Choose something that doesn’t invite polish. Something that feels explicitly like a different MODE than your usual writing.

When you transfer it to your main document later — after you’ve finished a chapter or hit your daily word count — THAT’S when you can lightly clean it up. Not during the discovery phase.

This creates a psychological separation between drafting and revising. Your brain learns: this tool is for mess, that tool is for refinement.

I know a thriller writer who opens a new document for each writing session so she can’t see what she wrote in the last session. Chaotic as hell - documents everywhere. Then she combines them all, takes a break, reads what she’s written, and THEN she revises (before sending to me).

Her drafts are full of typos, repetitive words and rough transitions. They’re also wildly creative, emotionally honest and structurally sound because she wasn’t stopping to fuss with sentences. She was following the story.

The rule: Any strategy that keeps you moving forward instead of circling back is the right strategy for you. Try all of these. Keep what works. Abandon what doesn’t.

What Your Inner Editor Needs to Hear

Your inner editor isn’t your enemy.

Hear me clearly because the writing world often treats the inner editor like a villain to defeat.

It’s not. It’s a valuable, essential part of your writing process that’s showing up at the wrong time.

Here’s what to tell it (out loud if you need to):

I see you. I value you. You’re excellent at your job. You catch my repetitive words, you smooth my clunky sentences, you make my writing clearer and stronger. I need your skills.

But right now isn’t your time.

I’m in discovery mode, not refinement mode. I need to write messily and follow where the story leads without judgment. I need to discover what this book actually is before I can shape it into its best form.

I’m asking you to wait. Not forever. Just until I have a complete draft.

When I’m ready for you - when I have all the raw material and I need your precision and expertise to make it shine - I will invite you back with gratitude. And then you’ll have plenty of work to do. All those [FIX LATER] notes? They’re for you. I’m saving them for when you can help.

But not now. Now I need to trust the mess. Trust me to call you when it’s time.

Then honor that promise. Don’t let your inner editor down.

After November, when you’re revising, let your inner editor have full access. Show it respect by actually using its gifts during the appropriate phase of the process.

The truth: Your inner editor isn’t trying to ruin your draft. It’s trying to protect you from the vulnerability of imperfect work. It thinks messy sentences are dangerous.

Thank it for caring. Then write messy anyway.

Self-Care: Nervous System Support

The editing urge isn’t a mindset issue. It’s a nervous system response.

When you write something rough and resist the urge to fix it, your body experiences that as a threat. Your inner editor is trying to eliminate the “danger” of imperfect work being seen (even if only by you).

You need to teach your body that messy writing isn’t dangerous.

Before you write: Place one hand on your heart, one on your belly. Take three slow breaths - in for four counts, out for six.

Say out loud: “I have permission to write badly today.”

Feel the words in your body. Notice any resistance. Breathe through it.

During writing: When the urge to edit hits, don’t just push through with willpower. Notice it physically first.

Where do you feel the urge in your body? Tight shoulders? Shallow breathing? Clenched jaw? Fluttery stomach?

That’s your nervous system responding to the perceived “threat” of imperfect work.

Respond with physical grounding:

• Roll your shoulders back and down

• Take one deep breath all the way into your belly

• Wiggle your fingers and shake out your hands

• Touch something solid (your desk, the floor, your chair)

• Then return to drafting

You’re teaching your body that rough sentences aren’t dangerous. You’re building the neural pathway that says “I can tolerate imperfection without immediately fixing it.”

After writing: Celebrate that you DIDN’T edit. Seriously.

You resisted a powerful compulsion. You chose momentum over perfection. You trusted the messy process instead of controlling it. That’s a significant win.

Write in your journal or say out loud: “Today I wrote [X number] words of messy, imperfect, alive prose. I did not edit. I kept moving forward. I’m proud of myself.”

This positive reinforcement matters. You’re rewiring the association between messy writing and shame. You’re building new neural pathways that say messy drafting is GOOD, not something to feel guilty about.

The practice: Each time you resist the editing urge and keep drafting, you build the muscle of trusting your creative process.

It gets easier. Your nervous system learns that rough drafts are safe. Your inner editor learns to wait its turn. The compulsion to fix everything immediately starts to loosen its grip.

But this only works if you practice it. Every single time you notice the urge and choose differently, you’re doing the work.

The Permission You Didn’t Know You Needed

Your rough draft doesn’t need to be good.

It needs to be DONE.

You’ll have months — years if you need them — to revise, refine and polish. But you only have November to write 50,000 words of discovery. Only this month to find out what your story is underneath all your plans and expectations.

Stop editing. Start trusting. Let the mess be messy.

The beauty comes later. Right now, you’re building the bones of your story. Bones don’t need to be pretty. They need to be present. They need to exist so there’s something to build on.

Write badly. Write boldly. Write without stopping to fix every sentence.

Your inner editor will have its turn. You’ll give it space to work its magic during revision. You’ll be grateful for its precision then.

But not today. Not this week. Not until you type “The End” on this messy, imperfect, alive first draft.

Write it messy. You can make it beautiful later. And I’ll be right here to help with that.

What’s your biggest editing trigger while drafting? That one thing that always makes you stop and revise instead of pushing forward? Share in the comments - naming the pattern is the first step to changing it.

I need to say that first, before we get into anything else. It’s week two of Novel November and you’re still here. Still writing. Still showing up. I’m so proud of you.

Some of you are ahead of your word count goals. Some are behind. Some are exactly on track. And while I haven’t been seeing this here on Substack, I have been seeing this in other places with writers doing NovNov: folks comparing themselves to each other.

Saying things like: “I only wrote 800 words today and I’m seeing folks talking about how they wrote 3,000 in one sitting.” “Everyone else seems to know where their story is going. I’m still trying to figure it out.” “I feel behind and we’re already in week two.”

So let’s talk about the comparison trap - why it hits different in fast drafting challenges, what it costs you energetically and how to stay in your own creative lane.

Cuz the only person you need to keep pace with is your protag waiting for you to tell their story.

Why Comparison Hits Different in Fast Drafting

Novel November is designed around visible metrics. Daily word counts. Progress bars. Achievement badges. Public accountability. The structure itself invites comparison.

And social media amplifies it. You see screenshots of 5,000-word days. You watch people celebrate hitting 25,000 words when you’re at 12,000. You read posts from writers who “just wrote for two hours and finished three chapters” while you’re still wrestling with one scene.

The comparison isn’t happening in your imagination. So don’t let people try and make you sound crazy. It’s happening in real time, all day, every day, right in your feed. Right in your face.

But take a step back for a minute and look at this from another perspective. Here’s what you’re actually comparing: their OUTPUT to your EXPERIENCE.

You see their word count. You don’t see the three hours they spent staring at the screen before those words came. You don’t see the scenes they’ll have to completely rewrite because they were forcing momentum. You don’t see their exhaustion or their doubt or the moments they wanted to quit.

You’re comparing their highlight reel to your behind-the-scenes struggle. And that comparison is destroying your creative fire.

The Energetic Cost of Comparison

Every time you check someone else’s word count, you’re pulling energy away from your own work.

Every time you measure your progress against theirs, you’re asking your nervous system to process threat signals. To your body, “falling behind” in a challenge feels like danger. Your system responds with anxiety, with stress hormones, with the urge to either push harder or give up completely.

Neither response serves you or your story.

When you’re anxious about pace, you write worse. Your sentences get tight — and not in a way that would make a line editor like me sing your praises. Your creativity contracts. You second-guess every choice because you’re not connected to your own intuition anymore, and instead, you’re trying to write at someone else’s speed, in someone else’s way.

This is a Fire element problem. You’re letting someone else’s flame affect your own burn rate.

Some writers are hot burners. They blaze intensely for long sessions, then need significant recovery time. They might write 5,000 words in one day, then only 500 the next two days while they process what they created.

Other writers are steady burners. They maintain consistent daily output without the dramatic highs and lows. They write 1,500 words a day, every day, and that rhythm sustains them.

Neither approach is superior. Both can complete 50,000 words in 30 days. But if you’re a steady burner comparing yourself to a hot burner’s peak day, you’ll feel inadequate. And if you’re a hot burner trying to force yourself into steady daily output, you’ll burn out.

Your Fire element has its own natural rhythm. Comparison disrupts that rhythm and makes you question what’s actually working.

Staying in Your Creative Lane

Here’s how to escape the comparison trap and return to your own work:

Track your own progress, not theirs.

Stop checking other people’s word counts. Seriously. Unfollow the accounts that post daily screenshots. Mute the hashtags that flood your feed with everyone’s numbers. You don’t need that information and it’s not helping you write.

Instead, track YOUR progress. Notice that you’re further along today than you were yesterday. Celebrate that you wrote 800 words when last week you would have written nothing. Pay attention to your own trajectory, not theirs.

Celebrate what YOU accomplished today.

Did you figure out a plot hole? Celebrate that. Did you write a dialogue exchange that felt real? Celebrate that. Did you show up and write even though you were tired? Celebrate that.

Not every victory is measured in word count. Some days, writing 200 good words is more valuable than forcing 2,000 bad ones. Some days, solving a structural problem is worth more than adding new scenes. Some days, just sitting down and trying is the win.

Sidebar: Seeing everyone’s word count is cool and all, but I’m enjoying seeing your REFLECTIONS day to day even more. Yes, seeing your struggles and achievements allows me to support you in a very practical way. But it’s also giving me wonderful fodder for my upcoming workshop once NovNov is over.

Your creative work has value beyond the numbers. Don’t let comparison blind you to what you’re actually accomplishing.

Notice when you’re about to check someone else’s progress — and don’t.

This is a practice. You’ll feel the urge to look, to check, to compare. Notice that urge. Name it: “I’m about to pull my energy away from my work and direct it toward measuring myself against someone else.”

Then make a different choice. Open your manuscript or your journal instead. Write one sentence. Stay in your own lane.

Every time you resist the comparison urge, you’re building the muscle of trusting your own process. It gets easier with practice.

Your competition is yesterday’s version of you.

That’s it. That’s the only comparison that matters.

Are you further along than you were yesterday? Yes? Then you’re succeeding.

Did you learn something about your story today that you didn’t know yesterday? Yes? Then you’re growing.

Are you still showing up, still writing, still committed to finishing? Yes? Then you’re exactly where you need to be.

Everyone else’s pace is irrelevant to your creative journey. They’re writing their story. You’re writing yours. These are not comparable tasks. Period.

Mercury Retrograde is Upon Us

Speaking of things that aren’t comparable: Mercury retrograde starts today and we’ll be in it for the rest of Novel November. And it’s in Sagittarius. Which means communication will be messy, tech issues will multiply and everyone’s going to be more blunt than usual.

You know what that means for comparison? Everyone’s about to get real LOUD. The complaints will be more dramatic. The celebrations will be more intense. The word count posts will be more frequent because people are trying to prove they’re still on track despite the chaos.

Don’t let Mercury retrograde noise pull you into comparison spirals. Mercury is a trickster. He will play in your face all day if you let him. This is the time to go INWARD with your work, not outward toward what everyone else is doing.

Your story doesn’t give a shit about Mercury retrograde. Your protag is unbothered by everyone else’s word count. Your creative fire doesn’t need external validation to burn.

Stay in your lane. Trust your pace. Keep writing.

Self-Care: Protecting Your Creative Energy

Comparison isn’t just a mindset problem. It’s an energy management problem. Here’s how to protect your Fire element from comparison drain:

Limit social media time.

Set actual timers. Give yourself 15 minutes to check in with the Novel November community, then log off. Don’t scroll endlessly through everyone’s updates. Get in, offer support if you want, get out, return to your work.

Your writing time is sacred. Social media is not.

Unfollow or mute accounts that trigger comparison.

You don’t have to hate them. You don’t have to think they’re doing anything wrong (because they aren’t). But if seeing their posts makes you feel inadequate, anxious or “behind,” that’s information. Honor it by removing the trigger.

You can follow them again after November. Right now, protect your energy.

Create a personal celebration practice.

Every day, when you finish writing, do something small that marks the accomplishment. Dance to a song. Make a cup of tea. Text a friend “I wrote today.” Put a star on your calendar. Email or tag me in a note so I can hype you up.

Build a celebration ritual that belongs to YOU, that has nothing to do with anyone else’s metrics or approval. Your wins deserve acknowledgment even when they’re small or quiet or not impressive by comparison standards.

Talk to your body: “We’re doing this at OUR pace and that’s sacred.”

Literally say this out loud. Your nervous system needs to hear that your pace is not simply acceptable — it’s sacred. Your rhythm is not simply valid — it’s necessary.

When anxiety about “falling behind” starts creeping in, return to your body. Hand on heart. Three deep breaths. “We’re doing this at our pace and that’s sacred.”

One grounding practice: Touch something real.

When comparison pulls you out of your creative flow and into anxiety, touch something physical. The ground under your feet. The desk under your hands. Your own heartbeat.

Comparison lives in your head, in abstract numbers and imagined judgments. Your story lives in your body, in the actual experience of creating. Return to the body. Return to the real.

The Truth About Pace

I’m an editor, and I’ve been supporting writers through challenges like this a long time. Here’s the truth: some people will finish Novel November and you might not. Some people will hit 50,000 words and you might fall short. Here’s another truth: nobody gives a shit.

None of that means anything about your worth as a writer or the value of your story.

Novel November is one challenge with arbitrary metrics. Fifty thousand words in 30 days is ambitious, but it’s not the definition of writing success. It’s not a rite of passage. It’s not a requirement for being a “real” writer.

It’s one approach to drafting. And it works beautifully for some writers while feeling torturous for others.

If you finish, celebrate that accomplishment. If you don’t, celebrate what you DID create. X-number of words that didn’t exist before. A clearer understanding of your story. Proof that you can show up even when it’s hard.

The comparison trap wants you to believe that finishing “counts” and not finishing “doesn’t.” That’s bullshit. I said what I said, and it’s not up for debate.

What counts is that you’re writing. What counts is that you’re growing. What counts is that you’re creating something that matters to you.

Their pace isn’t your pace. Their story isn’t your story. Their creative journey has nothing to do with yours.

Stay in your lane. Trust your fire. Keep burning at YOUR speed.

What’s Coming: Week 3

Next Sunday, I’ll publish support for the hardest week: When You Want to Quit (But You’re Not Done Yet).

Week three is when the initial excitement is gone, the finish line isn’t close enough to be motivating and you’re just tired. Week three breaks more people than any other week of this challenge.

I’ll share how to tell the difference between “I’m tired and need rest” and “I’m done with this story.” How to assess whether to push through or pivot. What your body’s actually telling you when you want to abandon your draft.

Until then: write at your pace. Celebrate your wins. Stay in your lane.

You’re doing this. And you’re doing it exactly right. Proud of you.

What’s your natural Fire rhythm - hot burner or steady burner? Have you noticed comparison affecting your creative energy this week? Share in the comments.

Subscribe now

It’s Day 2 of Novel November and I already see what’s happening.

Some of you are panicking because you don’t have a detailed outline. Others are drowning in the 20-page outline you created during Preptober and now feel trapped by it. A few of you started writing and realized your careful plan doesn’t actually match what wants to emerge on the page.

Let me tell you what you actually need: minimum viable structure.

Not an elaborate plotting system. Not a rigid beat sheet. Not a scene-by-scene breakdown color-coded by subplot.

But just enough Earth element to stay oriented without getting lost.

What Minimum Viable Structure Actually Means

Stepping into queen of swords energy…

lmma be real with you: you only need to know three things to write a complete draft.

Where you’re starting. What’s your main character’s situation when the story opens? What’s their normal world before everything changes?

Where you’re ending. Not the specific events of your final scene, but the emotional place your main character lands. How are they different from who they were at the beginning?

2-3 major turning points. The moments that shift everything. The choices that can’t be unmade. The reveals that change the game. You don’t need to know every scene between these moments - just the destinations you’re writing toward.

That’s it. That’s minimum viable structure.

Everything else can emerge as you write. The smaller scenes, the transitional moments, the dialogue that reveals character, the descriptions that build the world — these don’t need to be planned. They need to be discovered.

Earth element’s real job isn’t to predetermine every choice. It’s to hold space for Air clarity, Fire momentum and Water connection to flow freely. Structure serves the story. It doesn’t control it.

For Pantsers: Your Minimum (Yes, You Still Need It)

I know. You’re a discovery writer. You find your story by writing it. Outlines feel like death to your creative spirit.

When fast drafting without any structure, you tend to get lost around 15k words. The initial excitement fades and you have no idea where you’re going. You start writing in circles. You lose days trying to figure out what comes next.

You don’t need an outline. But you do need these three things:

Your main character’s core desire. What do they want more than anything? Not their surface goal (solve the murder, win the competition, get the guy). Their deep need. The thing they don’t even know they’re seeking until they find it.

What’s blocking them. The internal wound or external force that stands between them and that desire. This doesn’t have to be complicated. It just has to matter.

1-2 destination scenes. The moments you can see clearly even if you don’t know how you’ll get there. The confrontation. The revelation. The choice. The loss. Write toward these and trust that the path will reveal itself.

Everything else? Let it emerge. Follow the characters where they want to go. Trust what wants to be written.

Your minimum viable structure is knowing just enough to not get completely lost while still having space to discover your story.

For Plotters: When Your Outline Lies to You

Maybe you spent October planning. Maybe you only learned about Novel November two days before it started and decided to jot down some quick and dirty notes. Either way, I’m writing this assuming that you at least know your inciting incident, your midpoint reversal, your dark night of the soul. You’re the person who has their outline open in a second window while you draft.

And then around scene eight, your main character does something you didn’t plan. Or a secondary character becomes more interesting than you expected. Or the plot point that seemed perfect in outline feels forced on the page.

Your outline is lying to you.

It wasn’t bad. It was merely a hypothesis about what this story might need, written before you actually met these characters on the page. Now you’re discovering who they really are and what they actually need.

Here’s what to do:

Let the story deviate. Follow where it wants to go, even when it contradicts your careful planning. Your outline served its purpose. It got you started and gave you enough structure to begin. But it’s not a contract. It’s a working document that changes as you learn what this story actually is.

When characters insist on a different choice than you plotted, listen. When a scene that was supposed to be simple becomes complex, let it. When subplots emerge that you didn’t plan, follow them.

You can always cut what doesn’t work in revision. But you can’t discover what you’ve forced yourself not to write.

Your minimum viable structure is knowing your outline well enough to orient yourself, but holding it loosely enough to adapt when the story asks you to.

The structure isn’t there to control the creative process. It’s there to support it.

Self-Care: Structural Support for Your Body

Your manuscript needs Earth element. So does your body.

You cannot sustain 30 days of intensive creative output if you’re not building foundation into your daily life. Structure isn’t only for your story. It’s for your sustainability.

Your writing schedule is Earth element for YOUR life.

Don’t just plan word count goals. Plan your actual days. When will you write? When will you eat real food? When will you move your body? When will you rest?

Build these in. They are not rewards for hitting word count goals. They are requirements for showing up day after day. You’re running a creative marathon, not a sprint. Marathoners don’t skip hydration and expect to finish strong.

Meal prep or have easy meals ready. I’m begging y’all: not ramen or fast food for 30 days. Your brain needs protein and whole foods to function. Your creative work will be better if you’re actually nourished. Cook a big batch of something on Sunday. Soups and stews can be portioned out and frozen. Make it easy to feed yourself well.

Sleep is not negotiable. Your brain works while you rest. It processes what you wrote, solves plot problems and prepares for tomorrow’s scenes while you sleep. Staying up until 2am to hit your word count then dragging yourself through the next day exhausted is not sustainable. You’ll write better words in less time if you’re actually rested.

One grounding practice before you write each day: Literally touch the earth. Bare feet on ground if possible. Feel the solid foundation beneath you. Take three slow breaths. Remind your body that you’re supported, that you have everything you need right now, that the structure is there to hold you.

Earth element doesn’t restrict you. It holds you steady so the magic can happen.

The Real Challenge Isn’t Word Count

50k words in 30 days is ambitious, yes. But it’s not actually the hard part.

The hard part is sustaining creative fire without burning out. The hard part is maintaining connection to your story when you’re tired. The hard part is trusting the process when week three hits and everything feels messy.

Minimum viable structure gives you just enough foundation to keep going without so much rigidity that you lose the joy of discovery.

You don’t need to know everything. You just need to know enough.

Know where you’re starting. Know where you’re ending. Know a few key moments in between. Trust that everything else will emerge when it’s time.

Structure serves you. You don’t serve structure.

Go get your writing done. I’ll see you next Sunday with support for week two.

What’s your natural writing style - pantser, plotter or somewhere in between? What structure challenges are you already noticing this week? Share in the comments.

A few months after I had launched my editorial business back in 2020, a romance writer reached out to me in frustration. She’d paid $2,600 for what her editor called “comprehensive editing” on her 75k-word manuscript. Eight weeks later, she got her book back with corrected grammar and a few consistency fixes — basic copyediting work that today typically runs around $1,875 according to Editorial Freelancers Association 2024 rates.

Not only that, her beta readers were still saying the same things they’d said before. “I got lost halfway through.” “The ending felt rushed.” “I didn’t understand why the main character made that choice.”

She’d been charged developmental editing prices ($2,475 is typical according to the EFA) for surface-level work while her story’s foundation remained shaky. The structural problems that were actually preventing publication? Still there.

“I don’t get it,” she told me. “The editor said they fixed everything. But agents are still saying no, it needs more work.”

This happens because the publishing industry operates on insider knowledge many writers — especially Black writers — aren’t given access to. We’re expected to navigate a system built on assumptions about what we already know, then are blamed and ridiculed when we make expensive mistakes.

I’m a professional editor. Meaning, I trained to do what I do (and love). I didn’t simply decide to work with people’s manuscripts because I received top marks in English class. Based on my training and continued development as a professional, here’s what I can tell you: there are four distinct types of editing, each designed to solve different problems at different stages of your manuscript’s development.

Think of the editorial process like building and furnishing a house. You wouldn’t put in hardwood floors before the foundation is laid, and you wouldn’t hang artwork before the walls are painted. The same logic applies to editing your manuscript.

There are two levels of work happening: the macro and the micro.

The macro level is where developmental editing happens. This is the foundation, walls and roof of your house. It’s big-picture work that examines how your book functions as a whole — whether that’s story structure and character arcs in fiction, or argument flow and message clarity in nonfiction.

The micro level is where line editing, copyediting and proofreading happen. After your house’s structure is solid, it’s time to paint the walls, choose the interior design and arrange the furniture. This is sentence-level work that polishes your prose and eliminates what I call “speed bump errors” — the little mistakes that make for a poor reading experience.

Writing a book is a nerve-wracking experience all on its own. Getting it edited and ready for publication is another experience entirely.

Understanding this sequence can save you money, time and some of that headache.

Developmental Editing: The Foundation Work

Before we dive into what developmental editing actually is, let’s talk about what should happen first: self-editing.

I don’t believe writers should hand over a raw first draft to any editor. That’s like asking an architect to design your house before you’ve even established the vision for it. Some level of self-revision such as stepping back from your work, identifying obvious problems and making initial improvements should happen before you invest in professional editing.

You may be thinking, what’s the point? In my opinion, doing the first few rounds of revision contributes to your development as a writer. It’s also about being a good steward of your money and your editor’s time. When you’ve done your best self-editing work, your manuscript is in better shape for the developmental process, which means you get more value from what you’re paying for.

What developmental editing actually addresses:

• Content structure and organization: Does your plot/argument have a clear beginning, middle and end? Do scenes/chapters flow logically from one to the next?

• Character development and argument development: Do your characters grow and change? Are your key points strengthened throughout? Is your central thesis clear and well-supported?

• Plot holes, pacing issues and logical gaps: Are there gaps in story logic or argument flow? Does the content drag in places or rush through important moments?

• Point of view problems and voice consistency: Is it clear who’s telling the story or presenting the information? Does your narrative voice or expertise level stay consistent?

• Message clarity and audience connection: Does your content serve its intended purpose? Will your target readers understand and connect with your approach?

• Overall narrative flow: Does everything work together to serve your book’s central purpose?

In non-editor language: This is when your book has the right foundation but the pieces aren’t arranged properly. You know there’s a compelling story or valuable information in there, but something fundamental isn’t connecting with readers yet.

What developmental editing costs: According to the EFA, expect to pay around $0.033 per word, which comes to roughly $2,475 for a 75k-word fiction book. For nonfiction, expect to pay around $0.045 per word, which is roughly $3,375 for 75k words. Timeline is typically 6-8 weeks for the editor’s feedback, then 2-6 months for your revisions.

Red flags when hiring a developmental editor:

• They promise to “fix your voice” instead of strengthen it

• They don’t ask about your vision for the book or your target audience before starting

• They claim they can do comprehensive developmental work in under two weeks

• They don’t understand your genre or field (spiritual books need different treatment than business books)

• They focus on grammar and sentence-level issues instead of big-picture structure

• They don’t use track changes or explain their suggestions/restructuring

• They try to make your book sound like everyone else’s instead of preserving your unique perspective

A more affordable alternative: Manuscript Assessment

If full developmental editing isn’t in your budget right now, consider a manuscript assessment. This is essentially a mini developmental edit where the editor analyzes your manuscript’s strengths and weaknesses but doesn’t make changes to the document itself.

Instead, you receive a detailed report discussing their findings: what’s working, what isn’t and specific suggestions for improvement. You then implement the changes yourself.

Manuscript assessments and developmental editing both involve big-picture analysis, but they’re qualitatively different. An assessment is usually a one-time event without ongoing dialogue, making it a cost-effective option for writers who want professional insight but prefer to handle structural revisions themselves.

This approach can save you money while still giving you the roadmap you need to strengthen your book’s foundation.

Line Editing: The Flow Work

Once your house’s structure is solid, it’s time to focus on how everything flows together. Line editing is where we move from the macro level to the micro level — from big-picture structure to sentence-by-sentence craft.

What line editing actually addresses:

• Sentence-level clarity and rhythm: Do your sentences flow smoothly when read aloud? Do they vary in length and structure to create an engaging rhythm?

• Word choice and style consistency: Are you using the most precise words? Does your vocabulary match your audience and genre? Is your tone consistent throughout?

• Paragraph flow and transitions: Do your paragraphs connect logically? Can readers follow your train of thought easily?

• Tightening verbose passages: Are you saying what you need to say as clearly and concisely as possible?

• Enhancing voice and tone: Whether you’re writing a thriller or a business guide, does your unique voice come through consistently?

In non-editor language: This is when your book has good bones and solid structure, but the individual sentences don’t sing yet. Your ideas are clear, but the way you express them could be more engaging, more precise or more you.

What line editing costs: According to the EFA, expect to pay around $0.030 per word, which comes to roughly $2,250 for a 75k-word fiction book. For nonfiction, expect to pay around $0.040 per word, which is roughly $3,000 for 75k words. Timeline is typically 4-6 weeks for editing, then 2-4 weeks for your revisions.

Red flags when hiring a line editor:

• They want to change your dialect or cultural expressions to sound “more professional”

• They focus only on making sentences follow “proper” English rules without considering your voice or audience

• They don’t understand your genre conventions (business writing sounds different from memoir)

• They make changes without explaining why or give you examples

• They don’t use track changes

• They promise this will fix structural problems (it won’t)

• They don’t provide sample edits so you can see how they work (a good bit of editing is subjective, and every editor has their own style)

The difference this makes: Good line editing can transform readable writing into writing that sings. It’s the difference between getting your message across and having readers hang on to every word. Whether you’re crafting a romance novel or a spiritual guidebook, line editing helps your authentic voice reach readers more powerfully.

Copyediting: The Polish Work

Now we’re getting into the detail work, like making sure all the trim is properly installed and the paint job is smooth. Copyediting is technical and meticulous, focusing on correctness and consistency. A balm to my Virgo moon soul.

What copyediting actually addresses:

• Grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation: All the technical rules that make your writing clear and professional

• Consistency in details: Character names, dates, facts and terminology throughout your book

• Style guide adherence: Whether you use “doughnut” or “donut,” it should be the same throughout

• Fact-checking and research verification: Ensuring accuracy in historical details, statistics or technical information

• Internal logic consistency: Does your protag have brown eyes in chapter 2 and blue eyes in chapter 15? Does your business strategy align with current market realities?

In non-editor language: This is when your book flows beautifully and serves its purpose, but you need to ensure every detail is correct and consistent. It’s quality control that prevents readers from getting distracted by errors aka those speed bumps I mentioned earlier.

What copyediting costs: According to the EFA, expect to pay around $0.025 per word, which comes to roughly $1,875 for a 75k-word fiction book. For nonfiction, expect to pay around $0.035 per word, which is roughly $2,625 for 75k words. Timeline is typically 3-4 weeks for editing, then 1-2 weeks for your review.

Red flags when hiring a copyeditor:

• They claim this level of editing will fix story or argument problems (it won’t)

• They don’t use track changes or explain their corrections

• They charge developmental editing rates for copy work

• They make changes to your voice or cultural expressions without discussion

• They don’t ask about your style preferences upfront

• They don’t tell you what style guide, such as Chicago or APA, they will be referencing

  ---

Proofreading: The Final Safety Net

This is the final walkthrough before you hand over the keys. Proofreading happens when your book is essentially complete and formatted. It’s your last line of defense against embarrassing errors.

What proofreading actually addresses:

• Last-minute typos and formatting issues: The little things that slip through previous rounds

• Layout and design consistency: Making sure headers, spacing and formatting look professional

• Final verification of changes: Ensuring all previous editorial suggestions were implemented correctly (sometimes formatting can introduce new errors)

• Pre-publication quality check: One final review before your book goes live

In non-editor language: This is when your book is 99% ready and you just need someone with fresh eyes to catch anything you’ve missed after months of revisions. It should happen last.

What proofreading costs: According to the EFA, expect to pay around $0.016 per word, which comes to roughly $1,200 for a 75k-word book. For nonfiction, expect to pay around $0.025 per word, which is roughly $1,875 for 75k words. Timeline is typically 3-4 weeks.

Red flags when hiring a proofreader:

• They present this as the only editing you need or don’t explain why your book isn’t ready for proofreading yet

• They promise to fix story issues at this stage

• They want to make major changes to content or structure

• They charge bottom-of-the-barrel rates

• Claim they can proofread 100k words in two days or less (proofreading still requires meticulousness)

  ---

Why Sequence Matters (And Saves Time + Money)

Throughout this piece, I’ve been my house metaphor (I studied interior design back in the day). And I’m hoping you’ve been able to connect and integrate the analogy. You wouldn’t install hardwood floors before the plumbing is done, because you might have to rip them up later. The same logic applies to editing.

If you do copyediting first, then discover structural problems that require rewriting chapters, you’ve just paid to polish work you may end up not even using in the final version. Every rewrite, move or major revision can damage the detailed work that copyediting (and even line editing) provides.

The most cost- and time-effective sequence:

1. Self-editing (free, but requires time and distance from your work)

2. Developmental editing or manuscript assessment (structure and big-picture issues)

3. Line editing (flow and voice enhancement)

4. Copyediting (technical correctness and consistency)

5. Proofreading (final error check)

Your money-saving strategy: You should not be doing everything at once. Work on structure first, let that settle, then move to the next level when your budget allows. My best advice is not to skip ahead or work backward through the process. If you have questions about what your manuscript needs, ask. A good editor will be able to tell you whether your manuscript is indeed ready for the type of editing they offer.

A previous client of mine initially hired me for line editing. But as I worked through the manuscript, I found structural problems and immediately stopped, then had a discussion with her. Since I provide manuscript assessments, we changed the scope of the work. But if I didn’t, I would have recommended a DE for her work with, with an invitation to work together later once the structural work was complete.

A Note About Rates and Sample Edits

The rates I’ve quoted throughout this piece are 2024 median rates from the Editorial Freelancers Association. I’ve chosen to use the median rather than the range to give you realistic expectations. Visit their website for more information.

However, editors are self-employed professionals who can charge whatever they want. Some charge above these rates, some below. Price alone doesn’t determine quality. An expensive editor isn’t automatically better, and an affordable editor isn’t automatically worse.

Full transparency: I’m on the higher end of these ranges because I’ve been doing this work for years. I also don’t charge per word or per hour anymore like I did when I first started my business. I now charge per project because every writer is different. One writer’s 50k words might be in excellent shape and need only a light touch. Another writer’s 50k words might require heavy revision support. I believe I should be paid for the actual work required, not just word count.

A word about sample edits: Most professional editors offer sample edits so you can see their approach before hiring them. This is standard and helpful, and something I provide. However, I’ve seen — and been a victim of, for lack of a better word — writers request sample edits from multiple editors on different sections of their book, then attempt to piece together free editing work without hiring anyone. This is dishonest and counterproductive. Different editors have different styles, and “franken-editing” your book this way creates inconsistency problems you’ll have to pay someone to fix later.

The Bottom Line

Understanding these distinctions protects you from paying developmental editing prices for proofreading work, or expecting copyediting to fix structural problems. More importantly, it ensures your book gets the specific help it needs at each stage of development.

Whether you’re writing your first novel, a business guide or a spiritual memoir, knowing what type of editing you need — and what questions to ask before hiring anyone — puts you in control of both your budget and your book’s success.

If you’re still not sure what type of editing your book needs, or whether I’m the right editor for you (I’m definitely not for everybody), I’m happy to discuss it. No sales pressure, no schemes. Just an honest conversation about where your manuscript is and what it needs next.

Feel free to send a private message or an email to info@thestorytemple.com. Let’s figure out the best path forward for your book.

I’m thrilled to welcome to The Story Temple. Daan is the mind and keyboard behind Scribbled in Ink, where he writes about the craft of writing and shares some of his stories and poetry.

Daan and I met up in a Notes boost (I think…) and decided it would be fun to collab and guest-write for our communities. Like me, Daan is a line editor, and I knew his perspective would offer valuable Earth element mastery to the Temple.

Great writing isn’t just about big ideas, mind-bending plots and emotional depth. It’s also about the technical craftsmanship that allows those elements to shine. Writing and editing are two entirely different skills. And believe it or not, line editing is extremely creative (it’s the reason I became a line editor).

I’ve invited Daan to share his expertise on how sentence-level editing enhances rhythm, clarity and emotional impact in your manuscript. Enjoy this guest post, and be sure to check out his Stack for delightful fiction and more insights on the craft of writing.

Subscribe now

A lifelong love affair with words.

That’s what turned me into a writer, poet, and editor. Stories and music shaped my earliest years, and all the years to follow.

Whether I’m writing or editing, it’s this passion for words and music that guides my pen—or more recently—my fingers across the keyboard. Line editing is hands-down my favourite type of editing, because I get to help my clients make their words sing.

But what exactly is line editing, and how is it different from other types of editing?

Line editing is the form of editing that focuses on style and flow, repetition and redundancy, genre appropriate language, and consistency of style and voice, while preserving and strengthening the author’s unique voice.

Unlike developmental editing, it does not look at the big picture. Unlike copyediting, it doesn’t focus on accuracy, consistency in style and formatting, or inconsistencies, and unlike proofreading, it does not correct grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

But that’s in theory. In practice, the line is much blurrier, and I certainly won’t hesitate to point any of these issues out if I find them during a line edit. It’s just that I don’t focus on these things.

So how do I approach a line edit?

First things first: I listen. To rhythm, cadence, and melody.

Rhythm, Cadence, and Melody

Words are music.

When I’m line editing a manuscript, I approach it as if it were a piece of music. As I read the text, I pronounce every word in my mind, just as if I were reading it out loud. Just as I look at the score of a piece of music and hear the melody in my mind’s ear.

Listening to a manuscript this way helps me catch awkward phrasing, poor rhythm, or clunky sentences. Where do I stumble? Where do the words sound dull and monotonous? Why does this transition trip me up?

It also helps me pick up on repetition—not just repeated words, but also repetitive sentence structures. Reading aloud is also a great way to catch filler words and inconsistencies in tone and voice.

Another thing I pick up more easily this way, is the author’s use of sound devices like alliteration, consonance, assonance, etc. If the author doesn’t use these, that’s a missed chance, but overuse is far worse, as it can really pull the reader out of the story.

And that’s only a start.

Because just as importantly, I look for the larger melodic lines, and ask myself: does this line suit the scene? What emotion does the author want to convey here, and do the sentences work as intended?

Most authors know that sentence length influences pacing. The rule of thumb is: use short, punchy sentences to create tension, and long, legato lines to add depth and slow the pace down.

But it’s not always as simple as that. Because sometimes, like when we want to create a slow burn tension, long lines work better. And sometimes, a few short lines can add more depth to a character than one long sentence.

In the end, it’s really all about variation. About understanding which rhythmic patterns to use where, and when to deviate from them for maximum effect. It’s a tricky balancing act.

Let’s look at an example—deliberately written to showcase bad writing.

It was a dark night. The darkness was like a blanket, but not a soft one, maybe a heavy one, like wool or something. The wind blew, and it made a sound, and then it blew again. The street was empty, and also silent, and nothing was moving. The man walked slowly, very slowly. He thought about things. Things from before. And also some other things.

There’s nothing here to keep the reader engaged. It’s all one monotonous drone. As a line editor, my first question here would be: how do I inject some musicality into these lines?

Let’s give it a whirl, shall we?

Darkness wrapped around him like a shroud as he stumbled down the deserted street. His footsteps echoed through the quiet night. Memories flooded his mind. The wind whispered of things to come.

Isn’t that much better? All I did was vary sentence length, add some rhyme, and remove repetition. Well, that, and I started the paragraph with a metaphor to set the mood.

How would you have edited this fragment?

Leave a comment

Flow

Words are movement.

Our words should flow. But what exactly does that mean?

Basically—or maybe that’s the musician in me speaking—it’s that un-graspable ‘something’ that makes the writing sound right. The rhythm is just as it should be, the phrasing feels natural, there’s a pleasing harmony of sounds…

But there are two major types of flow, and as a line editor, I’m not equally invested in both of these. Let’s quickly distinguish between these types of flow to give you a clearer picture.

• Global flow: As the name suggests, this deals with how well a manuscript works as a whole. Does it have a coherent structure? Do events follow each other up logically? This is the developmental editor's area of expertise.

• Local flow: Here, we’re looking at cohesion on a sentence level. Do the sentences connect to each other smoothly? Is the author using the correct pronouns? Parallel structure? This is where the line editor’s expertise comes in.

Other things I watch for when assessing flow are: choppy or robotic sentences, wordiness, filter words (e.g. she felt, he saw, they thought), purple prose, anachronistic language, and transitions between paragraphs.

Here’s an example of a paragraph that lacks flow.

The sun was shining. Birds made sounds. The garden had many flowers. Then there was a noise. It startled her. The sound was loud. The bushes moved. A cat jumped out. She liked cats. They are soft. She smiled. The moment was interrupted.

Hard to make sense of this one, right? Time for a makeover—but where do I even start?

Let’s see… Our basic ingredients seem to be: a sunny garden, birds, a girl (or maybe a young woman, but the writing feels too immature for that to be true), and a cat.

Sally rolled over on her back and closed her eyes, the book temporarily forgotten. Sunshine tickled her skin, a warm breeze carried the subtle scent of roses, and birdsong filled the air. As drowsiness set in, her breathing slowed.

A sudden sound startled her wide awake. Heart thumping in her throat, she bolted upright. Something moved in the bushes. She gasped. A cat jumped out, and Sally laughed at her own silliness.

Yes, it’s longer now, but doesn’t the whole thing flow much better? Now we have a (mini) story instead of just some disjointed observations. What do you think?

Leave a comment

Imagery and Clarity

Words are paintings.

Well, not literally, but as authors, one of our main goals should be to paint pictures in our readers’ minds. And we only have words to achieve that. As a line editor, it’s my job to help the author paint the clearest pictures for their readers.

Musicians paint with tone and sound. A beautiful example would be Schubert’s Lied Cycle Die schöne Müllerin, with its recurring musical motives of the rippling brook, the miller’s lilting gait, and the ceaseless turning of the mill wheel, to name just a few.

The author paints with words, and one of the most potent tools in the author’s toolkit is sensory language, so that’s what I look for in a line edit: does the author make the words sing?

How, when and where does the author use sensory language? Is it enough? Too much? As with all things writing, it’s important to hit exactly the right notes.

Ideally, the author uses clear, precise language—or, if they use ambiguous phrasing, they should do so intentionally. (Ambiguity can be a good thing, for example, in the detective and thriller genre.)

Verbs should be sharp and crisp. Metaphors should fit within the context of the story’s world. (No band aids in a mediaeval inspired fantasy world, please.) Imagery should strengthen the scene’s tone—either through emphasis or through contrast.

Show more than you tell is not just some tired old writing advice. When we create clear pictures in our readers’ minds, we make it easier for them to connect to our characters and become fully immersed in our stories.

In the example below, vague language, weak verbs, flat imagery, and lack of sensory detail make for mediocre writing.

The hallway was interesting. Light came from somewhere, casting shapes on the floor. It smelled like something she couldn’t quite place. Her fingers brushed the wall, which felt kind of rough. A noise happened behind her, making her turn around quickly.

The revision below is just one way to breathe more life into this passage.

An imaginary fist clenched around her stomach as she entered the gloomy hallway. Ghostly shadows, cast by an undetectable light source, danced across the walls and floor. A strange, musty smell made her wrinkle her nose.

Startled by a noise from behind, she whirled around, losing her balance and scraping the back of her hand on the rough stone wall.

Again, the after is slightly longer than the before, but now we have sensory detail, vivid imagery, and improved flow.

Share

Between Craft and Art

Words are emotion.

In the end, this is what good writing is all about: emotion. Or, as Robert Frost said, ‘No tears in the writer, no tears in the reader. No surprise in the writer, no surprise in the reader.’

That’s the line editor’s ultimate goal: to ensure the author makes the reader feel. We want the reader to live vicariously through the protagonist’s experiences. It’s the author’s job to make that happen, and the line editor’s job to help them achieve this.

This is where line editing crosses the line between craft and art. A good line editor knows the rules. They can rattle off all the technicalities in their sleep. But that’s not enough.

The real challenge lies in feeling what works and what doesn’t. And that’s something no craft book can teach. It’s an innate sensitivity, carefully cultivated over time. It’s like playing a musical instrument: the more you do it, and the more focused your practice, the better you become at it.

To take the analogy ever further: you develop an ear for it. Did the author strike the right tone? Does that ornamentation work? Where does the author’s voice need strengthening? Where should it be more restrained? Does every word carry its weight?

It’s a delicate dance. One faux pas, and the entire scene may come tumbling down. Or, coming back to the musical analogy, one false note, and the entire aria may be spoilt. In writing, this means that one wrong word can ruin an entire passage.

A Symphony in Black and White

The maestro and the conductor

In the end, line editing is a marvellous mix of technical skill and intuitive art, a dance between precision and creativity. Fixing obvious mistakes, while definitely part of the line editor’s job description, is only the upper layer. The real magic happens on a deeper level.

The line editor listens to the song of the words. To rhyme and rhythm. Cadence and flow. They pay attention to phrasing. To pace. Emotional resonance.

Ultimately, the aim is always the same: to make it look easy. As if the author just sat at their desk and wrote the entire novel in one sitting. Without conscious effort or need for reflection and revision.

Because the reader doesn’t want to see the hard work that goes into the writing of a novel. They simply want to enjoy a work that pulls at their heartstrings. One that’s alive with music, colour, and motion.

That’s why the best books are those where author and editor form a true team: the author as the maestro, and the line editor as the conductor.

From Creative Fire to Sacred Container

Last week, we explored the power of creative confi…

Read more

Building on Elemental Foundations

Every writer knows that moment when the magic flows, when words pour onto the page with natural grace and power. But we also know the opposite — those times when doubt creeps in and confidence falters.

In last week’s exploration of story elements, we discovered how Air, Fire, Water and Earth each play crucial roles in our writing. Today, we’ll build on that foundation to develop sustainable creative confidence — the kind that weathers any storm because it’s built on both solid technique and deep self-trust.

As we come down from the high of the Leo Full Moon, we’re called to examine both the practical and energetic aspects of creative confidence. Like the moon growing in light and power, our creative confidence strengthens when we understand its fundamental elements.

Subscribe now

Understanding Creative Confidence

Creative confidence is more than just believing in yourself. It’s the dynamic balance between trusting your intuition and mastering your craft. It’s knowing when to follow the rules and when to break them. When to push forward and when to pause for reflection.

Why does this matter? Because confidence shapes every aspect of our writing process:

• It affects how deeply we’re willing to explore our themes

• It influences the risks we take with our stories

• It determines how we handle feedback and criticism

• It impacts our ability to finish what we start

Yet writers often face common confidence challenges:

• Comparing our first drafts to published works

• Feeling overwhelmed by craft “rules”

• Struggling to trust our creative instincts

• Fear of judgment or rejection

• Difficulty maintaining momentum through challenges

The good news? Creative confidence can be developed systematically, just like any other aspect of our craft. By combining practical techniques with energetic understanding, we can build confidence that's both robust and flexible.

Core Techniques

Voice Development: Your Creative Signature

Your writing voice is like your fingerprint — uniquely yours, impossible to replicate. Yet many writers struggle to trust their natural voice, often trying to sound like someone else or conform to perceived “rules.”

Think of your voice as the way all four elements combine uniquely in your writing:

• Air: Your particular way of expressing ideas

• Fire: Your unique approach to tension and action

• Water: Your specific emotional resonance

• Earth: Your distinct structural preferences

Recognizing your natural voice:

Before you can strengthen your voice, you need to recognize it. Notice which elements you naturally gravitate toward. Do you instinctively focus on emotional nuance (Water)? Or do you excel at building complex worlds (Air)?

Distinguishing author voice from character voice:

• Author voice: Your underlying style and perspective

• Character voice: The distinct ways your characters express themselves

• Where they meet: How your natural voice enhances rather than overshadows your characters

Exercise: Voice mapping

1. Choose a passage you’ve written that felt particularly natural

2. Identify your elemental patterns:

   1. What ideas draw you?

   2. How do you handle action?

   3. Where does emotion show up?

   4. What structures do you prefer?

3. Notice what emerges without forcing

Finding balance:

The goal isn’t to ignore craft rules but to understand how they serve your natural voice. When you know the rules deeply, you can choose consciously when to follow them and when your voice calls for something different.

Reflection: What’s something you feel is unique about your writing voice?

Leave a comment

Style Strengthening: Building on Your Natural Magic

Once you recognize your voice, you can consciously develop your unique writing style. Think of style as how you wield your elemental strengths to create specific effects in your writing.

Identifying natural strengths:

Every writer has elements where they naturally excel. Rather than forcing yourself to conform to someone else’s style, start by identifying what you do instinctively well:

• Are your action scenes particularly vivid?

• Do readers comment on your emotional depth?

• Is worldbuilding your superpower?

• Do you craft especially tight plots?

Working with your patterns:

Notice the patterns that emerge naturally in your writing:

• Sentence rhythms you gravitate toward

• Description styles that feel effortless

• Story structures that consistently serve you

• Character dynamics you handle with ease

Instead of fighting these patterns, learn to enhance them consciously. Your natural tendencies are often pointing toward your unique strengths as a writer.

Developing signature techniques:

Turn your instinctive moves into deliberate tools:

1. Identify what works best in your writing

2. Analyze how you achieve those effects

3. Practice deploying these techniques intentionally

4. Refine them through conscious application

Exercise: Style mapping

Choose a scene you’re particularly proud of:

1. Mark every moment that feels distinctly “you”

2. Analyze how you created those effects

3. List three ways to apply these techniques in new contexts

4. Practice using them deliberately in your next scene

Building on success:

Each success builds creative confidence. When you understand your natural style preferences, you can:

• Make conscious choices about when to use them

• Push their boundaries intentionally

• Adapt them to new challenges

• Trust your instincts about what works

Reflection: What’s something others have told you is unique about your writing voice?

Leave a comment

Creative Decision-Making: Trusting Your Story Wisdom

Once you understand your voice and style, the next challenge is trusting yourself to make strong creative choices. This is where many writers falter, second-guessing their instincts or becoming paralyzed by options.

Trusting your instincts:

Your creative instincts are often your elements working in harmony:

• Air whispers about thematic connections

• Fire urges you toward dramatic moments

• Water guides emotional resonance

• Earth grounds you in story logic

The key is learning to recognize and trust these elemental nudges rather than dismissing them as “just feelings.”

Balancing feedback with vision:

Feedback is valuable, but not all feedback serves your story. Learn to:

• Filter suggestions through your elemental understanding

• Recognize which critique points resonate with your vision

• Know when to stand firm and when to adapt

• Trust your story’s natural direction

Note: Don’t allow this to deter you from seeking feedback as it valuable and helps you grow as a writer. But not all feedback — as genuine as it may be — will serve your story or your vision. And that’s simply real talk from an editor (me!).

Making conscious craft choices:

Strong creative decisions come from understanding both rules and instinct:

1. Know the traditional approach

2. Understand why it works

3. Consider your story's unique needs

4. Choose consciously rather than defaulting

Exercise: Decision mapping

When facing a story decision:

1. List the conventional wisdom

2. Note your instinctive pull

3. Identify which elements are at play

4. Make a conscious choice based on both

Standing firm:

Sometimes the strongest creative choice is maintaining your vision when:

• Feedback conflicts with your story’s core truth

• Convention doesn’t serve your specific story

• Your instincts consistently point another way

• The “rules” would weaken your unique voice

Confidence grows when we make conscious choices rather than passive ones.

Share

Practical Implementation

Confidence-Building Exercises

Moving from theory to practice, let’s explore concrete ways to build your creative confidence. Like any skill, confidence grows through consistent practice and conscious development.

Assessment and action:

Rather than treating confidence as an abstract goal, break it down into manageable pieces:

• Scene confidence: Trust in your storytelling choices

• Voice confidence: Faith in your unique expression

• Style confidence: Belief in your creative decisions

• Technical confidence: Trust in your craft understanding

Creating your confidence practice:

1. Start with what works

   1. Identify scenes you’re proud of

   2. Note techniques you use confidently

   3. Recognize patterns that serve you well

   4. Build from these strengths

2. Expand mindfully

   1. Challenge yourself in small, manageable ways

   2. Practice new techniques in low-stakes situations

   3. Celebrate small victories

   4. Document your progress

3. Learn from setbacks

   1. Analyze what didn’t work and why

   2. Adjust your approach

   3. Return to your strengths

   4. Try again with new understanding

Self-Trust Practices

Working with resistance:

Resistance often signals important creative territory. When you feel pushback:

• Pause and assess which element feels blocked

• Dialogue with your resistance through journaling (Tip: use different colored pens — one for you and one for your resistance.)

• Look for the wisdom in your hesitation

• Find a small step forward

Handling self-doubt:

Transform self-doubt from obstacle to ally:

• Use doubt to identify areas needing attention

• Question your assumptions, not your worth

• Seek specific solutions rather than general reassurance

• Build evidence of your capability

Building creative resilience:

• Maintain a “wins” journal (or a “wins” section of your current journal)

• Track your progress

• Collect positive feedback

• Document breakthrough moments

Momentum Maintenance

Creating sustainable practices:

• Design routines that honor your natural rhythms

• Build in recovery time

• Plan for obstacles

• Create support systems

Establishing writing rhythms:

• Identify your peak creative times

• Work with your energy, not against it

• Create realistic schedules

• Build in flexibility

Recovery strategies:

• Have multiple projects at different stages

• Know your reset activities

• Maintain creative community

• Keep inspiration readily available

Integration Tools

Progress tracking:

• Regular check-ins with your goals

• Milestone celebrations

• Pattern recognition

• Adaptation as needed

Growth documentation:

• Keep a creative journal

• Note what works and why

• Track questions and discoveries

• Record insights for future reference

Confidence maintenance:

• Regular practice review

• Skill inventory updates

• Community engagement

• Continuing education

Download the Story Temple Strategy Spread - a free tool for mapping your creative strengths and growth areas through elemental wisdom.

Creative confidence isn’t about eliminating doubt or uncertainty. It’s about building such strong foundations that you can work effectively even when doubt visits. Trust in your process, believe in your vision and keep showing up for your story.

Building Creative Confidence: Your Next Steps

Understanding creative confidence is one thing — developing and sustaining it is another. While these techniques can help you build trust in your process, sometimes you need support to fully claim your creative sovereignty.

I offer several ways to support your creative confidence journey:

Story Foundation Strategy Sessions: Perfect for writers ready to strengthen their creative voice and trust their unique magic. We’ll explore your natural creative patterns and develop strategies for sustainable confidence.

Manuscript Evaluations: Get a comprehensive analysis of your story’s strengths and potential, identifying where your creative voice shines brightest and where it seeks to grow stronger. Includes detailed recommendations for building confidence through craft mastery.

Comprehensive Editing: Ready to fully claim your creative power? We’ll work with both technical craft and story medicine to ensure your unique voice rings clear and true.

Ready to build lasting creative confidence? Contact me via private message or email info@thestorytemple.com to discuss your creative journey.

Don’t forget to download the Story Temple Strategy Spread for mapping your creative strengths and building sustainable confidence.

Next week: “Sacred Structure Framework: Building Strong Story Foundations” — Discover how structure supports rather than constrains your creative sovereignty.

Read more

Read more

Read more

In the realm of speculative fiction, story analysis requires more than just general reflection. Beyond examining character arcs and plot points, we must evaluate complex magic systems, multilayered worlds and intricate supernatural elements. This technical guide offers a systematic approach to analyzing your speculative fiction work to help you transform intuitive understanding into actionable insights.

The Difference Between Analysis and Reflection

While reflection often focuses on the emotional journey of writing, story analysis takes a more systematic approach. Think of it like this: reflection is like taking in the entire vista of a magical landscape. Whereas analysis is about mapping each element, understanding how they interact and ensuring the world operates consistently within its own rules.

Here’s another example of reflection vs. analysis using Brandon Sanderson’s Mistborn series (one of my favorites). Reflection might explore how the ash-covered world creates a mood of oppression and despair. Analysis, however, would map out exactly how the ash falls, its effect on agriculture, how allomancers navigate through it and how it intersects with the magic system’s metals. One gives us feeling. The other gives us function.

Setting Up Your Analysis Framework

Creating Review Templates

Your analysis template should include:

• Scene/Chapter Tracking Sheet

• Character Development Grid

• Worldbuilding Consistency Checklist

• Magic System Interaction Log

• Plot Point Progression Map

Establishing Evaluation Criteria

For each major story element, define specific metrics:

Plot Structure:

• Scene purpose clarity (1-5 scale)

• Conflict progression

• Subplot integration

• Resolution satisfaction

Character Development:

• Motivation clarity

• Power/ability progression

• Relationship evolution

• Arc completion

Worldbuilding:

• Rule consistency

• Cultural depth

• Environmental logic

• Technology/magic integration

Technical Elements Deep Dive

1. Plot Structure Analysis

Create a scene-by-scene breakdown including:

• Primary conflict

• New information revealed

• Magic/technology used

• World elements introduced

• Character decisions made

Track how each scene advances:

• Main plot

• Character development

• World understanding

• Magic system revelation

For example, in a scene where your main character uses time manipulation for the first time, don’t simply track the revealing of the ability. Also track how it affects existing plot threads, whether it creates new conflicts and how it might impact future story events. A character learning they can rewind time by ten minutes needs to be documented for both its immediate impact and its implications for all future conflicts.

2. Magic System Coherence

Document:

• Core rules and limitations

• Power progression mechanics

• System interactions

• Consistency violations

• Cost/consequence balance

For instance, in a story with elemental magic, document how fire magic interacts with water magic, what energy cost each spell requires and whether a fire conjurer (mage/witch/magician/etc.) can create flames from nothing or needs an existing source. These interactions and limitations will affect everything from individual scenes to major plot resolutions.

3. Worldbuilding Consistency

Audit your world elements:

• Physical laws and exceptions

• Cultural systems and conflicts

• Historical impact on present

• Environmental influences

• Technological/magical integration

Consider how a floating city’s anti-gravity technology affects everything from waste management to agriculture. Or how a world with two suns would impact not just the environment but cultural development and religious beliefs. Every technological or magical element creates ripples throughout your entire world system.

Implementation Tools

Story Analysis Worksheet

A quick note about implementation: This framework can be adapted to your preferred writing style. Create a digital template in Google Docs for easy duplication across projects (use checkboxes for the technical elements and consistency check). Or dedicate a section in your writer’s journal/grimoire using a bullet journal collection format. The key is making it easily accessible for future reference during your analysis process. If using a journal/grimoire, don’t forget to index this collection for quick access during revision sessions.

• Scene ID: [Chapter/Scene Number]

• Purpose: [Primary Story Function]

Technical Elements:

• Plot advancement

• Character development

• Worldbuilding

• Magic system reveal

Consistency Check:

• Magic rules followed

• World logic maintained

• Character motivations clear

• Technology limitations respected

Integration Rating (1-5):

• Plot integration

• Character integration

• World integration

• Magic/Tech integration

Notes:

• Potential inconsistencies:

• Elements to develop:

• Questions to address:

Progress Tracking System

Create a master document tracking:

1. Scene completion status

2. Character arc progression

3. World-building element introduction

4. Magic system revelation timeline

5. Technology implementation sequence

Practical Application

Step-by-Step Analysis Process

1. Complete initial full read-through of your story

2. Create story element inventory

3. Perform scene-by-scene analysis

4. Document inconsistencies

5. Develop revision strategy

6. Implement changes systematically

7. Verify fixes don’t create new issues

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

• Introducing magic elements without prior foundation

• Inconsistent power scaling

• World rules that contradict each other

• Technology that appears without context

• Character abilities that exceed established limits

Let’s return to Mistborn as an example of avoiding these pitfalls. Notice how Sanderson introduces the basic eight metals and their powers early, then gradually reveals the existence of more metals and deeper implications. This careful scaling ensures that new abilities feel like discoveries rather than convenient solutions.

Action Steps for Implementation

1. Immediate Actions

• Create your analysis templates

• Set up tracking systems

• Choose one scene for practice analysis

2. First Week Tasks:

• Complete story element inventory

• Analyze first three chapters

• Document all magic system rules

3. Ongoing Practice:

• Weekly consistency checks

• Monthly system audits

• Revision plan updates

Technical analysis doesn’t replace creative intuition — it supports it. By understanding the mechanical elements of your story, you free your creativity to work within consistent, believable boundaries.

Need Another Set of Eyes?

These tools can certainly help you analyze your own work. But maintaining objectivity with a story you’ve been deeply immersed in can be challenging. If you’d like a fresh perspective on your manuscript’s technical elements — from magic system coherence to worldbuilding consistency — I offer manuscript evaluations that can help identify both the strengths and potential pitfalls in your story’s framework.

Contact me via private message or send an email to info@thestorytemple.com to discuss how we can strengthen your story’s foundation together.

Next week in the Workshop: “Writing Assessment: A Data-Driven Guide” — Mining Story Data for Fantasy and Science Fiction Projects

Leave a comment

Subscribe now

After exploring common plot holes in speculative fiction, let’s master one of the most powerful tools for preventing them: foreshadowing. Good foreshadowing transforms your most fantastic elements from convenient solutions into inevitable revelations.

Using Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets as our guide, we’ll explore how to plant and develop clues that keep readers engaged while playing fair with your story’s mysteries.

Basic Foreshadowing Concepts

Early Setup

J.K. Rowling demonstrates masterful setup in the first few chapters of Chamber of Secrets:

• Dobby’s warnings about danger at Hogwarts

• Ginny’s secondhand cauldron containing Riddle’s diary

• Mr. Weasley’s warning about magical objects that think for themselves

• The mysterious voice Harry hears in the walls

Each element serves an immediate purpose while setting up later revelations. The diary seems like a minor detail in Ginny’s school supplies, but becomes central to the plot. Dobby’s warnings create immediate conflict while foreshadowing genuine danger.

Application Exercise:

List three early-chapter elements in your story that could:

1. Serve the immediate scene

2. Set up later revelations

3. Misdirect readers from their true significance

Layer Your Clues

Chamber of Secrets uses three types of foreshadowing:

1. Physical Evidence

• Water on the floor near attacks

• Spiders fleeing the castle

• Dead roosters

• Writing on the walls

2. Character Behavior

• Ginny becoming withdrawn

• Percy acting suspiciously

• Hagrid’s nervousness

• Nearly Headless Nick’s petrification (provides crucial clue about basilisk’s gaze)

3. Background Information

• The legend of the Chamber

• History of Salazar Slytherin

• Previous opening fifty years ago

• Moaning Myrtle's death

Building Mystery Through Multiple Viewpoints

Chamber of Secrets builds tension by showing how different characters interpret events:

The Authority Figures

• Teachers debating the Chamber’s existence

• Dumbledore’s careful observations

• McGonagall’s growing concern

• Lockhart’s false bravado

The Students

• Various theories about the heir

• House rivalries affecting interpretations

• Fear spreading through the school

• Different reactions to each attack

The Suspects

• Malfoy’s hints and taunts

• Hagrid’s suspicious behavior

• Harry’s own doubts about himself

Each viewpoint adds layers to the mystery while providing both genuine clues and red herrings. Lockhart’s boasting creates false confidence, while Dumbledore’s concern signals genuine danger. Student rumors spread both truth and falsehood, making it harder to distinguish real clues from speculation.

Environmental Storytelling

Rowling uses Hogwarts’ various locations to plant and develop clues:

The Library

• Research about basilisks

• Historical records of the Chamber

• Books with torn pages (Hermione’s crucial discovery)

• Restricted section’s dangerous knowledge

The Corridors

• Attack locations revealing pattern

• Spider movements marking safe paths

• Mysterious voices in the walls

• Writing in blood on walls

The Chamber Itself

• Snake motifs suggesting basilisk

• Ancient architecture revealing age

• Evidence of recent activity

• Pipe system explaining movement

Each location contributes to both immediate atmosphere and larger mystery. The library provides necessary information while the corridors show active danger. The Chamber’s design confirms centuries of history while revealing current threats.

Advanced Techniques

Multiple Payoffs

Consider how the diary serves multiple reveals:

• Initially appears harmless

• Reveals past events through memories

• Seems to prove Hagrid’s guilt

• Actually demonstrates Tom’s manipulation

• Finally reveals its true nature

• Sets up Horcrux concept for later books

Practical Application:

Create a payoff grid for your major plot elements:

• Element: [Your story element]

• Immediate Role:

• Mid-story Revelation:

• Final Significance:

• Series Implications:

• Thematic Meaning:

Progressive Revelation

Notice how Chamber of Secrets builds its mystery:

1. Initial incident (Mrs. Norris)

2. Historical context (Binns’ lesson)

3. Pattern development (multiple attacks)

4. False lead (Harry as heir)

5. Partial truth (Riddle’s memory)

6. Complete revelation (diary’s nature)

Environmental Storytelling

Rowling uses Hogwarts itself to plant clues:

• Spiders’ behavior reveals basilisk’s presence

• Bathroom flooding indicates Myrtle’s involvement

• Roosters’ deaths (basilisk’s weakness) appear as background details

• Victims’ positions reveal how they survived

Practical Exercises

Exercise 1: Character Behavior Matrix

Create a tracking grid for suspicious behavior:

Character: [Name]

Normal Trait | Changed Behavior | Hidden Reason | Who Notices

Outgoing | Withdrawn | Secret | Friends

Punctual | Often missing | Activity | Teachers

Direct | Evasive | Knowledge | Siblings

Exercise 2: Location Clue Mapping

For three key locations in your story, develop:

• One obvious clue

• One subtle detail

• One misleading element

Example from Chamber:

Location: Moaning Myrtle’s Bathroom

• Obvious: Water on floor

• Subtle: Spiders fleeing

• Misleading: Focus on Myrtle’s death details

Exercise 3: Mystery Timeline Construction

Create a revelation timeline like Chamber of Secrets:

Month 1:

• Initial warning signs (Dobby’s warning)

• Background hints (diary’s appearance)

• Character introductions (Lockhart, Dobby)

Month 2:

• First major incident (Mrs. Norris)

• Red herrings appear (Harry as suspect)

• Investigation begins (Library research)

Month 3:

• Pattern emerges (Multiple attacks)

• False conclusions (Hagrid’s involvement)

• Stakes escalate (Hermione’s petrification)

Final Act:

• True nature revealed (diary’s power)

• Clues connect (Basilisk explanation)

• Resolution achieved (Chamber battle)

For your story, map out:

• Key revelations

• False leads

• Escalating stakes

• Resolution points

  ---

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Learn from Rowling’s successful techniques:

1. Don’t Make Hints Too Obvious

• Bad: Directly stating importance

• Good: Nearly Headless Nick’s petrification subtly reveals basilisk’s eye-contact rule

2. Don’t Forget Resolution

• Bad: Leaving mysteries unexplained

• Good: Every strange element in Chamber connects to final revelation

3. Don’t Rely on Coincidence

• Bad: Convenient discoveries

• Good: All revelations come through investigation or character action

4. Don’t Withhold Crucial Information

• Bad: Hiding key clues from readers

• Good: All necessary information available but cleverly disguised

  ---

Your Gateway to Stronger Writing

Strong foreshadowing creates a satisfying reading experience where revelations feel both surprising and inevitable. Study how your favorite books plant and develop clues, then apply these techniques to your own work.

Remember:

• Plant early seeds

• Layer different types of clues

• Build progressive revelations

• Create multiple payoffs

• Use environment effectively

• Resolve all mysteries

Next in the Worldweaver’s Workshop: “Winter’s Wisdom: A Craft Guide to Creative Cycles in Speculative Fiction” - where we’ll explore how to craft authentic magical systems based on natural energy patterns. First up: “Mapping Creative Cycles” coming January 3rd, 2025.

Want feedback on your foreshadowing? Email me at info@thebookdruid.com with the subject line “Foreshadowing Review” to learn more about my editing and consulting packages.

After exploring the intricacies of portal fantasy in our recent series, it’s time to zoom out and examine broader structural challenges in speculative fiction. Whether you’re crafting transitions between worlds or building a single complex universe, maintaining narrative consistency is crucial for keeping readers immersed in your story.

For speculative fiction writers, maintaining a cohesive structure is paramount. It’s the scaffolding that supports your worldbuilding, character development and ultimately, the believability of your narrative. 

“The only difference between reality and fiction is that fiction needs to be credible.” ― Mark Twain

Let’s explore five common plot holes related to structure that can trip up even seasoned writers, along with solutions to help you craft a compelling and internally consistent story:

Weak Character Motivation

In speculative fiction, it’s easy to get caught up in the grandeur of your imagined world or the intricacies of your magic system. However, at its core, every story is driven by characters and their motivations.

Plot hole: The main character sets out on a perilous quest simply because an ancient prophecy dictates they should.

Solution: Go deeper into the personal implications of the prophecy. How does it affect your character’s life, relationships or world view? What internal conflicts does it create? Perhaps the character initially resists the prophecy, adding tension and depth to their journey.

Example: In N.K. Jemisin's The Fifth Season, Essun’s (the main character) motivation isn’t just about fulfilling a destiny, but about finding and protecting her daughter in a world ravaged by apocalyptic events. Her personal quest intertwines with larger, world-altering events.

Predictable Plot Points

While tropes can be powerful tools in speculative fiction, relying too heavily on them can make your story feel formulaic. The key is to understand these tropes so you can subvert reader expectations and keep them guessing.

Plot hole: The hero always escapes danger at the last second, with convenient plot devices repeatedly saving the day.

Solution: Raise the stakes and let your characters face real consequences. Create situations where escape seems genuinely impossible, forcing them to adapt and find innovative solutions that arise organically from their skills or the rules of your world.

Example: In Ted Chiang’s Story of Your Life (adapted into the film Arrival), the main character’s understanding of an alien language changes her perception of time itself. This unique plot device drives the story in unexpected directions, defying traditional narrative structures.

Deus Ex Machina Solutions

In speculative fiction, it’s tempting to use the fantastical elements of your world to resolve plot points. However, convenient solutions that haven’t been properly set up can feel cheap and unsatisfying.

Plot hole: The main character discovers a previously unmentioned magical artifact or scientific breakthrough that solves their problem at the eleventh hour.

Solution: Establish the existence and limitations of crucial plot elements early in the story. Let your characters earn their victories through strategic planning, character growth and clever use of established rules within your world.

Example: In Ursula K. Le Guin's The Left Hand of Darkness, Genly Ai (the protag) navigates a complex alien culture using his diplomatic skills and growing understanding of the planet’s inhabitants. His success comes from character development and cultural insight rather than convenient plot devices.

Inconsistent Worldbuilding

Speculative fiction thrives on creating unique worlds with their own rules and systems. Maintaining consistency in your worldbuilding is crucial for preserving the reader’s suspension of disbelief.

Plot hole: Characters suddenly exhibit abilities or face limitations that contradict previously established rules of the world.

Solution: Develop a clear, well-defined set of rules for your speculative elements. Create a “bible” or “grimoire” for your world that you can reference as you write. If you need to introduce new elements, carefully consider how they fit within the established framework and explain their existence logically within the story.

Example: Brandon Sanderson’s Mistborn series is renowned for its consistent and well-explained system of metal-based magic. The rules are clearly established, and new developments always work within the confines of this system, adding depth without contradicting earlier information.

Emotionally Disconnected MacGuffins

In speculative fiction, the quest for a powerful object or piece of information (a MacGuffin) often drives the plot. However, if this device lacks emotional resonance, the story can feel hollow.

Plot hole: The characters pursue a powerful artifact or crucial piece of information, but it has no real connection to their personal journeys or the themes of the story.

Solution: Imbue your MacGuffin with emotional or thematic significance. How does it relate to your characters’ internal struggles or the central themes of your story? Make the pursuit of the MacGuffin a journey of personal growth or moral questioning for your characters.

Example: In Jeff VanderMeer’s Annihilation, the mysterious Area X and the secrets within it serve as more than just a destination or goal. It becomes a mirror for the main character’s internal struggles, reflecting themes of identity, transformation and the unknowable nature of the universe.

Your Gateway to Stronger Writing

Plot holes can threaten even the most imaginative speculative fiction, but with careful attention to structure and consistency, you can create stories that transport readers while maintaining their trust. Remember: in speculative fiction, the impossible must feel inevitable, and the fantastic must feel real.

As we’ve explored in our portal fantasy series, the key to compelling speculative fiction lies in the details—not just in what we show readers, but in the solid foundation that supports every magical moment or scientific breakthrough. By addressing these common plot holes early in your writing process, you can build stories that stand up to even the most thorough reader scrutiny.

What plot challenges are you facing in your speculative fiction writing? Share your experiences in the comments, and let’s brainstorm solutions together.

Coming Next Week: The Art of Foreshadowing in Speculative Fiction, with lessons from Harry Potter.

Struggling with plot holes in your manuscript? Email me at info@thebookdruid.com with the subject line "Plot Review" to learn more about my editing packages.

The best portal fantasies don’t simply create two separate worlds — they craft a compelling relationship between them. As both an editor and magical practitioner, I’ve found the true magic lies not in the individual worlds, but in how they interact, influence and intrude upon each other.

The Fundamental Rule of Portal Fantasy Worldbuilding

Your worlds must be different enough to create wonder, but connected enough to feel part of the same story. Let’s break down how to achieve this balance.

World Echoes: Creating Resonance

Before your character ever steps through the portal, the other world should make its presence known. Consider how to create:

1. Subtle Intrusions

• Unexplained phenomena

• Strange dreams or visions

• Mysterious objects that don’t quite belong

• Whispers of other-worldly knowledge

2. Environmental Shifts

Weak: “The air felt different near the portal.”

Strong: “Three blocks from the old mansion, the air began to taste of metal and midnight. Aaron’s watch ran backwards on Tuesdays, and the pigeons flew in perfect geometric patterns.”

Technical Elements of Two-World Building

1. Physical Laws

For each world, establish:

• How magic works (or doesn’t)

• Natural laws that differ from our world

• Physical constraints on crossing between worlds

• Environmental features unique to each realm

Editor’s Tip: Create a “physics bible” for each world. What rules are different? What stays the same? Why?

2. Time Mechanics

Address these crucial questions:

• Does time flow differently between worlds?

• What happens to time in one world while characters are in the other?

• How do these differences affect plot and character?

• What are the consequences of time disparities?

Common Pitfall: Inconsistent time rules can create plot holes. Map out your time differences carefully.

3. Portal Mechanics

Establish clear rules for:

• What can pass through (people, objects, magic)

• When the portal can be used

• How the crossing affects travelers

• What traces crossing leaves behind

  ---

The Connection Framework

Use these techniques to build meaningful connections between worlds:

1. Parallel Elements

• Create echoes between worlds

• Use similar motifs with different meanings

• Show how events in one world affect the other

• Develop matching but contrasting locations

2. Contrast Points

• Highlight differences through direct comparison

• Create tension between world rules

• Show how characters must adapt

• Use contrasts to drive plot

Exercise:

List three elements that exist in both worlds but function differently:

1. [Natural element - e.g., water flows upward]

2. [Social structure - e.g., hierarchy based on dreams]

3. [Physical law - e.g., time moves in reverse]

Building Believable Boundaries

The boundaries between worlds are crucial. Consider:

1. Border Zones

• Create areas where worlds blend

• Show how reality breaks down near portals

• Develop unique features of threshold spaces

• Use sensory details to mark transitions

2. World Bleeding

• Show how worlds leak into each other

• Create consequences for this bleeding

• Use these effects to drive plot

• Develop characters who monitor boundaries

Technical Example

Basic: “The worlds were starting to merge.”

Detailed: “Reality grew thin at the edges. Flowers from the other side bloomed in Jasmin’s garden, their petals humming with impossible colors. Her neighbors’ dreams began walking the streets at twilight, and time folded itself into origami shapes around the old crossing points.”

Practical Applications

When building your worlds, use these technical tools:

1. World Bible Template

• Physical laws and differences

• Time relationships

• Portal rules and limitations

• Cross-world influences

• Boundary effects

2. Consistency Checklist

• Track rules and their exceptions

• Note any violations that need fixing

• Document cause-and-effect relationships

• Map cross-world connections

3. Effect Tracking

• Monitor how each world influences the other

• Document changes over time

• Track character adaptations

• Note unintended consequences

  ---

Common Worldbuilding Pitfalls

1. Making worlds too similar or too different

2. Inconsistent portal rules

3. Forgetting to show world interaction

4. Neglecting the impact on regular life

5. Unclear boundaries between realms

   ---

Strengthening Your Worldbuilding

Try this exercise to deepen your world connections:

1. Choose one location that exists in both worlds

2. List how it differs in each realm

3. Show how these differences affect your character

4. Create a scene showcasing the contrast

Strong portal fantasy worldbuilding isn’t just about creating two interesting worlds — it’s about crafting a compelling relationship between them that drives your story forward.

Your Gateway to Advanced Worldbuilding

Portal fantasy worldbuilding demands technical precision combined with creative vision. By carefully managing the intersection of your worlds, tracking their influences on each other and maintaining consistent rules for their interaction, you can create rich, layered narratives that feel both magical and grounded.

This concludes our Portal Fantasy Craft Series. We’ve explored the structural foundations, character dynamics and technical aspects of world relationship management. Each element builds upon the others to help you craft compelling portal fantasies that transport readers while maintaining narrative integrity.

Next in the Workshop: “5 Common Plot Holes in Speculative Fiction (and How to Avoid Them)” - where we’ll explore how character motivation, world consistency and plot devices can make or break your story’s credibility. From avoiding deus ex machina solutions to strengthening emotional connections, we’ll examine common structural pitfalls and provide practical techniques for maintaining narrative integrity across your speculative fiction.

Ready to refine your world relationships? Email me at info@thebookdruid.com with the subject line “World Review” to discuss how we can strengthen the connections between your realms.